[buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
15 Feb 2024 13:16 - 15 Feb 2024 13:16 #293376
by Mecanix
[buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked? was created by Mecanix
2.9.2-x releases appears locked since Feb 2nd. Do we need to move to /master-uspace/ a.k.a 2.10.0~pre0.x to get fixes and updates?
Ref: buildbot2.highlab.com/debian/dists/bookworm/
Ref: buildbot2.highlab.com/debian/dists/bookworm/
Last edit: 15 Feb 2024 13:16 by Mecanix.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2024 13:22 #293379
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
2.9.2 is the last update of the current stable release 2.9. Bugfixes will be released as 2.9.3, if there are any.
2.10 is the current version number for the development branch of linuxcnc.
2.10 is the current version number for the development branch of linuxcnc.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2024 13:30 - 15 Feb 2024 13:30 #293380
by Mecanix
Replied by Mecanix on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
Fixes used to be pushed over to 2.9.2-x however stopped at 2.9.2-112-g54bca16afd on February 2nd for some reason.
Are you saying that in order to receive the most recent bugfixes we need to change:
Perhaps the buildbot2 is just on holiday?
Are you saying that in order to receive the most recent bugfixes we need to change:
deb http://buildbot2.highlab.com/debian/ bookworm 2.9-uspace
(to)
deb http://buildbot2.highlab.com/debian/ bookworm master-uspacePerhaps the buildbot2 is just on holiday?
Last edit: 15 Feb 2024 13:30 by Mecanix.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2024 13:33 #293381
by Aciera
It is indeed possible that the buildbot is down.
Replied by Aciera on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
Ah, now I get what you mean. No, don't do that.Are you saying that in order to receive the most recent bugfixes we need to change:
It is indeed possible that the buildbot is down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2024 13:37 #293384
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
Seems that there simply haven't been any commits in the last two weeks on the 2.9 branch:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/2.9
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/2.9
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mecanix
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2024 13:38 #293385
by Mecanix
Replied by Mecanix on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
So confusing.....
A well deserved holiday if indeed it's down. Not complaining. Just wanted to follow-up fixes as they are spotted and patched.
A well deserved holiday if indeed it's down. Not complaining. Just wanted to follow-up fixes as they are spotted and patched.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 Feb 2024 13:42 #293387
by Mecanix
Replied by Mecanix on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
A bugless release. Good. Excellent. Looking good!!Seems that there simply haven't been any commits in the last two weeks on the 2.9 branch:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/2.9
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 Feb 2024 10:35 #293496
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
The buildbot you refer to does not feed into the official release.
2.9.2 is a tag, github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/v2.9.2
You should be able to git checkout v2.9.2
2.9.2 is a tag, github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/v2.9.2
You should be able to git checkout v2.9.2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 Feb 2024 13:43 #293506
by Mecanix
Replied by Mecanix on topic [buildbot2.highlab] 2.9-uspace locked?
I'm not running the official release, but the regularly patched and more updated v2.9.2-xx one rather.
Buildbot2 is a great resource and convenience. Just got worried it was down... should have checked the commits first. Luckily member Aciera had more sleep than I had, and pointed out the obvious. All good.
Buildbot2 is a great resource and convenience. Just got worried it was down... should have checked the commits first. Luckily member Aciera had more sleep than I had, and pointed out the obvious. All good.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.382 seconds