- Posts: 73
- Thank you received: 0
Retrofitting a 1986 Maho MH400E
even if it was under Water it may be still intact.
Mine had a film of coolant inside, everywhere.
I washed it with brake cleaner and it's perfect again.
Cheers
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- drimaropoylos
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Thank you received: 0
hanmon wrote: Hi there,
counted my balls today
240, exactly. As the ballscrew nut has 7 ball returns I expected the Number to be a multiple of 7 minus one or two cracked balls. I don't know how to interpret that result.
Cheers
My old y axis ball screw with only 3 rows of balls left on it. I can measure 37 balls on every row.
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
If you are referring to the ROD 27? - could you go into more detail about removing it from the rotary table? I have two rotary tables an the servo driven one looks as if the coolant turned the cog belt pulley into swiss cheese. Was trying to get the steel ball to release on the ROD to table shaft without success - just squirt it with super thin oil every time I walk pass it. Thanks for mentioning "Brake cleaner" as I forgot about that.
What is the latest about the ball screw adventure?
Bob
Please Log in to join the conversation.
What size is your MAHO ? For some reason I thought you machine is a MH500E.
Bob
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- drimaropoylos
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Thank you received: 0
John
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
thank you for that info.
I read somewhere that the gap on a line should be within the size of 1-5 balls.
Do you still have that ?
If I calculate your number for the seven lines, almost 20 balls are missing.
I will fill the nut an see how many balls it will take.
I adjusted the wedge on the X-axis.
Measured the original unmachined spacer to have 10,48mm.
Made a second test-spacer out of a tube and turned it down to 10,40mm and 10,32 which was enogh.
Turned the original spacer down to that 10,32mm then.
According to the manual a spacer reduction of 0,13mm minimizes the play about 0,001mm,
whatever that means and how they measure that.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- drimaropoylos
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- drimaropoylos
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Thank you received: 0
This is what you have adjusted?hanmon wrote: Hi drimaropoylos,
I adjusted the wedge on the X-axis.
Measured the original unmachined spacer to have 10,48mm.
Made a second test-spacer out of a tube and turned it down to 10,40mm and 10,32 which was enogh.
Turned the original spacer down to that 10,32mm then.
According to the manual a spacer reduction of 0,13mm minimizes the play about 0,001mm,
whatever that means and how they measure that.
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
