- Posts: 310
- Thank you received: 0
More control over waiting for the spindle to come up to speed?
Also, is there any way to delay rapids, as well, until the spindle is up to speed?
Since I probably want to ensure the spindle-stopped input also gives the spindle time to come to a complete stop, maybe the best way to handle this is to add some kind of delay to the two inputs. Perhaps timedelay is the way to do this?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Chris M
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You could use a very small relative move to cause it to waitAlso, is there any way to delay rapids, as well, until the spindle is up to speed?
Cheers, Phill.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
JetForMe wrote: I'm just really nervous about this machine doing the right thing until I get everything perfected.
That's what rapid, feed and spindle override is for.
Chris M
Please Log in to join the conversation.
SOFT START
then you can be shure it is almost at the speed
as spindle at speed will acoor later and the vfd will get up slow
Please Log in to join the conversation.
JetForMe wrote: Moreover, since my at-speed input is based on the VFD's output frequency and not the actual spindle speed, I'd like to introduce a delay of a second or two after the input asserts to ensure the spindle is all the way up to speed.
Do you have a spindle encoder? Even a single ppr encoder could be used to bypass this. (and it would catch more problems, too, like when I left my gearbox in neutral last weekend before starting the cycle.)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
andypugh wrote: Do you have a spindle encoder? Even a single ppr encoder could be used to bypass this. (and it would catch more problems, too, like when I left my gearbox in neutral last weekend before starting the cycle.)
Alas, if I did, this would be easier.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
