- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 0
Ditching Mach 3/4 LinuxCNC is The Plan!
- Rhine_Labs
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
"If the numbers are 100 us or more (100,000 nanoseconds), then the PC is not a good candidate for software stepping."
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- LearningLinuxCNC
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 208
- Thank you received: 0
Latency Test after a 1/2 hour of my son playing hard max jitter was 159,657ns so maybe not good enough for using the LPT port?
Did you make sure to disable all power saving features in BIOS?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
You need to be sure to turn off most if not all power saving features in the bios, as well as disabling any hyper-threading. If it is a multi core cpu, (most are anymore) it often will benefit from setting up isolcpus.
There are some tricks here
wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?The_Is..._Parameter_And_GRUB2
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Rhine_Labs
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Rhine_Labs
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 0
CPU Pentium 4 @ 3ghz W/2GB Ram
I Turned every power item I could find off in the bios.
Hyper-threading Disabled
On Board Audio Off
Fan On
Wake on Anything Disabled or to Stay On
Floppy Disabled
ACPI Suspend State S1 "S1 is the safest mode but consumes more power. S3 consumes less power, but some drivers may not support this state."
Gateway Midway 4000887 Board Info.
Closest MB Manual since it is a gateway dont have all the options. Even updated it to the latest Bios I could find.
So should I pitch this box and look for another with better latency or do you think it would work with a mesa card?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Contract_Pilot wrote: So should I pitch this box and look for another with better latency or do you think it would work with a mesa card?
You could try using it anyway. Get started on the fun parts of the project.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
The only problem is it would limit you to older releases of linuxcnc (I think 2.5 was the last version to support it)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Rhine_Labs
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Rhine_Labs
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 0
Business Name:
Tormach, Inc. (The recipient of this payment is Verified)
Email:
info@tormach.XXX
Total amount:
-$37.65 USD
Fee amount:
$0.00 USD
Net amount:
-$37.65 USD
Item amount:
$37.65 USD
Quantity:
1
Item Title:
Online Order
Item Number:
ORD20150916XX
Date:
Sep 16, 2015
Time:
16:34:17 PDT
Status:
Completed
I should have never went mach!!! LCNC way simpler just from playing around! To bad Tormach does not offer pay and download foring to be an interesting 2-3 week wait for the disk!
Was able to get every thing but the steppers to move on the new additions.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- racedirector
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 218
- Thank you received: 0
Hear, hear, I agree 100%. Was never able to get my machine to do what I wanted it to under Mach3. Under LCNC, after figuring out a few bugs, I just ran a test part with 3 different tool changes and some 3D thrown in for good measure and the machine performed flawlessly. Only touched off once manually at the beginning of the job to set Z zero, everything else was automated aside from physically changing the cuttersContract_Pilot wrote: I should have never went mach!!! LCNC way simpler just from playing around!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
