- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 0
Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
6 years 9 months ago #153870
by Clive S
The sensors are adjustable to get the quad correct.
Replied by Clive S on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
For threading you just need Z +A but for ridged tapping you need quad. for direction so Z + A + Bmooser wrote: I see the index slot but just noticed the 3rd sensor,
Please elaborate, is it quad or directional?
Thanks
M
The sensors are adjustable to get the quad correct.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
6 years 9 months ago #153892
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
If you have an existing index sensor, just use it. Then it would not matter if the encoder is connected 1:1 (You'll just need to figure out how many pulses/rev your ratio gives you.)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 9 months ago #153902
by mooser
Thanks
I've never tried the rigid tapping on the lathe, normally just slowed the spindle way down and used the tailstock / drill chuck and reversed the spindle (m code) when the tap was near it's end
If I get the encoder working I might have to experiment with rigid taping
M
Replied by mooser on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
Clive S wrote:
For threading you just need Z +A but for ridged tapping you need quad. for direction so Z + A + Bmooser wrote: I see the index slot but just noticed the 3rd sensor,
Please elaborate, is it quad or directional?
Thanks
M
The sensors are adjustable to get the quad correct.
Thanks
I've never tried the rigid tapping on the lathe, normally just slowed the spindle way down and used the tailstock / drill chuck and reversed the spindle (m code) when the tap was near it's end
If I get the encoder working I might have to experiment with rigid taping
M
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 9 months ago #153903
by mooser
I'm hoping not to have to buy a different encoder and the two I have are both non-indexed so my plan is to use the existing sensor for index. Without worry on the index I should be able to deal with a spindle / encoder ratio even if it's just lying about the number of counts (or at least I think so)
M
Replied by mooser on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
Todd Zuercher wrote: If you have an existing index sensor, just use it. Then it would not matter if the encoder is connected 1:1 (You'll just need to figure out how many pulses/rev your ratio gives you.)
I'm hoping not to have to buy a different encoder and the two I have are both non-indexed so my plan is to use the existing sensor for index. Without worry on the index I should be able to deal with a spindle / encoder ratio even if it's just lying about the number of counts (or at least I think so)
M
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 9 months ago #154322
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
You can use a single pulse.
Connect that pulse to A and Z of the counter and set the counter to "counter mode" so that it does not need a B phase.
Make sure you use the "position-interpolated" output of the encoder counter module.
Adding more slots for A will make things better. And a full quadrature counter would allow for rigid tapping (as mentioned). You can't rigid tap without all three phases working as the system can't detect spindle direction changes.
You could keep an eye out on eBay for "elevator encoder" as some of those seem to feature a very large through-hole and might direct-fit to the spindle.
Are there any gears in the head? You could potentially derive A and B using hear tooth sensors on the bull gear, if the lathe has one.
Connect that pulse to A and Z of the counter and set the counter to "counter mode" so that it does not need a B phase.
Make sure you use the "position-interpolated" output of the encoder counter module.
Adding more slots for A will make things better. And a full quadrature counter would allow for rigid tapping (as mentioned). You can't rigid tap without all three phases working as the system can't detect spindle direction changes.
You could keep an eye out on eBay for "elevator encoder" as some of those seem to feature a very large through-hole and might direct-fit to the spindle.
Are there any gears in the head? You could potentially derive A and B using hear tooth sensors on the bull gear, if the lathe has one.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 9 months ago #155767
by mooser
Replied by mooser on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
Another small step forward
Timing gears showed up yesterday and I've got the one bored out (lathe works but pretty awkward without a pendant or any form of MPG:) and fit to the spindle tube. Hod ot machine off the existing hub completely but it's the smallest one I could find that still had enough meat left once opened up
Now to make some form of bracket to hold the encoder down below there and run some wires.
Once the encoder is working I thing can move on and tackle the gears
M
Timing gears showed up yesterday and I've got the one bored out (lathe works but pretty awkward without a pendant or any form of MPG:) and fit to the spindle tube. Hod ot machine off the existing hub completely but it's the smallest one I could find that still had enough meat left once opened up
Attachment not found
Attachment not found
Now to make some form of bracket to hold the encoder down below there and run some wires.
Once the encoder is working I thing can move on and tackle the gears
M
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 8 months ago #156553
by mooser
Replied by mooser on topic Starting from scratch (again) - Spindle encoder Question
2048 line US Digital Encoder with index installed and working correctly, onward to the gears
M
M
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.060 seconds
