- Posts: 611
- Thank you received: 0
Newbe - LinuxCNC or Mach3
10 years 9 months ago #68622
by Rick G
Replied by Rick G on topic Newbe - LinuxCNC or Mach3
Take a look here...
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/install/Latency_Test.html
and...
linuxcnc.org/docs/html/config/stepconf.html
Rick G
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/install/Latency_Test.html
and...
linuxcnc.org/docs/html/config/stepconf.html
Rick G
Please Log in to join the conversation.
10 years 9 months ago #68703
by caprio
Replied by caprio on topic Newbe - LinuxCNC or Mach3
Hmmm, So outta the box fresh install and update of LinuxCNC 2.7.3 I'm seeing latency of:
Servo 42237(ns)
Base 26936(ns)
Not even close to what some of you are reporting (15000, 8000)
I'm using an ATI X1300
I tried the isolcpus and irqbalance tricvks by adding the kernel options but that didn't work well.
The Latency actually jumped to 46910(ns) . After a bit more research it appears that isolcpus is
no longer needed/used.
Servo 42237(ns)
Base 26936(ns)
Not even close to what some of you are reporting (15000, 8000)
I'm using an ATI X1300
I tried the isolcpus and irqbalance tricvks by adding the kernel options but that didn't work well.
The Latency actually jumped to 46910(ns) . After a bit more research it appears that isolcpus is
no longer needed/used.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
10 years 9 months ago #68706
by andypugh
That will do. It's not spectacular, but it is quite good enough.
Replied by andypugh on topic Newbe - LinuxCNC or Mach3
caprio wrote: Hmmm, So outta the box fresh install and update of LinuxCNC 2.7.3 I'm seeing latency of:
Servo 42237(ns)
Base 26936(ns)
That will do. It's not spectacular, but it is quite good enough.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
10 years 9 months ago #68707
by Ozcnc
Replied by Ozcnc on topic Newbe - LinuxCNC or Mach3
Before I got some tweaking going I was sitting at 75000 with spikes taking it up to 150000.
But mine wasn't usable.
But mine wasn't usable.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.048 seconds
