LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341190 by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
it was true:

16 bit IN TRUE ini.traj_arc_blend_enable

I was running the torus gcode (from the torus.png --> image to gcode with whatever defaults)

EDIT: here's the gcode that triggered the bug:

 

Attachment not found


 

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341192 by grandixximo
You are right, my apologies, I was looking at it on my phone, and it formatted it intuitively. We'll be looking into it, thank you for reporting

---
test signature

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341197 by endian
next testing round in 3d contouring, 25k line and later are critial and we can observing high accel-cmd peaks ... I am not expert, I need to ask you guys before create any outcomes... I can chare gcode file but here it exceeding limit

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341199 by grandixximo
Short segments seems to have some bug, might be next week for a fix...

---
test signature

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341200 by endian
Do you need to share the code or any assistance please?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341204 by ruediger123
Hello,

I've also tested several NC programs.
The jerk isn't maintained at transitions and at the end of the movement.
My configuration and the NC programs are attached.

gruß
Rüdiger

 

Attachment not found

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341226 by grandixximo
Share the gcode please, and we will take a look next week

---
test signature

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341227 by tommylight
He did but you probably did not get a notification as he edited the existing post.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341231 by grandixximo
@PCW

try with

setp ini.traj_max_jerk 3000
and
setp ini.traj_default_jerk 3000

I do not get acc violation with these values, can you confirm?

---
test signature

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 months 3 weeks ago #341232 by grandixximo
@ruediger123

at the moment jerk-cmd are debug pins, they are not to be used for machine control, because the current calculations try and do best we can to calculate and blend quickly in realtime, there are knowm spikes in the jerk-cmd, please look at vel-cmd and acc-cmd everything looks very good to me there, there are no violations there, if we were to respect jerk cmd strictly the interpolation would not be able to run as fast as it does, but we could look at making a stricter mode viable as an alternative, or possibly the default if that's what the community needs.

---
test signature

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.251 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum