- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
Can I use LinuxCNC with an isel GFM4433 with an iMC4 motion control board in it?
Thanks,
L
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
However your definition of working with it and mine may be different.
Mach3 could probably run it as well but it may not be able to reuse existing drives and hardware. Linuxcnc can probably reuse existing drives and feedback hardware (given the proper interface equipment. )
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks,
L
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks,
L
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
lou_new1 wrote: Okay. By work, I mean work stock without any electronic modifications. I have researched replacing the Motion control board, but it'd be cheaper still (and safer) to just buy their fairly pricey proprietary software. Any advice on what plugin/driver/software mod/settings would be great.
Thanks,
L
That is what I was afraid you were getting at. In that case you are probably out of luck
Linuxcnc is a motion controller, it would be replacing the existing motion controller board. Linuxcnc needs to do the motion control itself. You would need to remove the motion controller, and add the right interface hardware for linuxcnc to control the servo or stepper drives directly. If you don't want to replace the motion control board, or if the motor drives are built into it, it's not going to work.
Mach3 and Mach4 are much happier being just a user interface/g-code interpreter and handing off the motion control to external hardware.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks,
L
Please Log in to join the conversation.
lou_new1 wrote: Oh okay. What would you suggest I do? Just use the proprietary software?
Thanks,
L
I dont know what drives are in there but worst case: could get mesa board gecko drives and linuxcnc under 800.00 and your in buisness.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks,
L
Please Log in to join the conversation.
But, to get up and going quickly, if you want the project to be making things, rather than configuring a machine, then the original software is probably the most expedient.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
