linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit

Can you post the result of running this command:

ip a

Thanks!

Hallo
i thaught i had it attached in an .pdf. I hop now it will work.
Thank you very much fore help me.

Hello agin it is not attached itry to insert:
uhu@uhu:~$ ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 38:d5:47:16:f9:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.10.10.11/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global noprefixroute enp1s0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::2265:82f9:7b9c:c6d0/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
uhu@uhu:~$
i hop you will find the problem thank you very much

I don't think a /8 netmask will work, you should use /24
(netmask 255.255.255.0)

Ip range 10.n.n.n uses /8 netmask normally, can be set to /16 or/24 to isolate intra networks.
But the netmasks are in the following format:
255.0.0.0 = /8
255.255.0.0 = /16
255.255.255.0 = /24
While broadcasts are:
10.255.255.255
10.10.255.255
10.10.10.255

After writing the IP address the netmask gets set automatically to 8.
P.S.
Sorry for double posting but editing takes a while.

Fixed the netmask in my reply
but still think /24 netmask is needed
(Need to check the 7I92s netmask logic)

If it helps, almost all my machines use 7i92 and all use the /8 netmask, never had a single issue.
Even the big Hurco uses 7i92 and same IP setup.
Oh goodie, found a PDF :
nsrc.org/workshops/2009/summer/presentat.../day3/subnetting.pdf

At some point the 7I92s netmask got changed from fixed
to EEPROM based. I need to check what this is set to.

OP:

Is the situation still the same? That is, what does:

mesaflash --device 7i92 --addr 10.10.10.10 --readhmid

report?

I always use an 8 bit mask now with a 10.0.0.0 network,  but I do remember having issues with one of the mesa cards and when I set it to a 24 bit mask it worked.


/edit subnetting makes my head hurt so I don't do it anymore....lol