- Posts: 102
- Thank you received: 0
Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
2 years 2 months ago #306561
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0a:cd:00:00:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.178.55/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp2s0
valid_lft 862882sec preferred_lft 862882sec
inet6 2003:ce:5f08:8600:c668:e1df:16a1:628a/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 6832sec preferred_lft 971sec
inet6 fe80::3e8d:84c2:564c:edaa/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:23:24:5b:b4:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s25
inet 10.10.10.2/24 brd 10.10.10.255 scope global noprefixroute eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::282c:39b2:ab82:4316/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0a:cd:00:00:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.178.55/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp2s0
valid_lft 862882sec preferred_lft 862882sec
inet6 2003:ce:5f08:8600:c668:e1df:16a1:628a/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 6832sec preferred_lft 971sec
inet6 fe80::3e8d:84c2:564c:edaa/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:23:24:5b:b4:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s25
inet 10.10.10.2/24 brd 10.10.10.255 scope global noprefixroute eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::282c:39b2:ab82:4316/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306562
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
" IRQ coalescing is not disabled." How can I do that?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306566
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
man hm2_eth
for instructions for doing this permanently
to test temporarily:
sudo ethtool -C eno1 rx-usecs 0
for instructions for doing this permanently
to test temporarily:
sudo ethtool -C eno1 rx-usecs 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306570
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
Hi PCW,
the result with the ethtool is very sufficient:
So, do I have to copy this line in my .hal file? Or is there another way to do that permanently? I don't find that clearly in the manual doc. I'm sorry that I'm not a Linux pro but a newbie to all that.
Thanks, Arno
the result with the ethtool is very sufficient:
Attachment not found
So, do I have to copy this line in my .hal file? Or is there another way to do that permanently? I don't find that clearly in the manual doc. I'm sorry that I'm not a Linux pro but a newbie to all that.
Thanks, Arno
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306571
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
As described in the hm2_eth man page, it involves adding the appropriate text
to the /etc/network/interfaces file, in your case, adding something like:
auto eno1
iface eno1 inet static
address 10.10.10.2
hardware-irq-coalesce-rx-usecs 0
You need to run the editor as root (with sudo) to edit this file
After editing the file its probably best to re-boot and then check if the
setting works with:
ethtool -c en01
to the /etc/network/interfaces file, in your case, adding something like:
auto eno1
iface eno1 inet static
address 10.10.10.2
hardware-irq-coalesce-rx-usecs 0
You need to run the editor as root (with sudo) to edit this file
After editing the file its probably best to re-boot and then check if the
setting works with:
ethtool -c en01
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306912
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
Hello PCW,
thank you for your answers! (sorry for delay, I was very busy the last days and couldn't do anything at my machine.)
I tried the lines in /etc/network/interfaces file and after reboot my internal Intel network was disabled. Just auto internet with RLT8111 is possible. The file is as follows:
Well, internet network is ok. What is the faulty setting here?
thank you for your answers! (sorry for delay, I was very busy the last days and couldn't do anything at my machine.)
I tried the lines in /etc/network/interfaces file and after reboot my internal Intel network was disabled. Just auto internet with RLT8111 is possible. The file is as follows:
Attachment not found
Well, internet network is ok. What is the faulty setting here?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306914
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
This is the feedback of ip a without the suggested lines:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0a:cd:00:00:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.178.55/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp2s0
valid_lft 862758sec preferred_lft 862758sec
inet6 2003:ce:5f08:8600:6ae7:3d2d:fe1d:c940/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 7101sec preferred_lft 1700sec
inet6 fe80::d017:c5ae:2734:c531/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:23:24:5b:b4:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s25
inet 10.10.10.2/24 brd 10.10.10.255 scope global noprefixroute eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0a:cd:00:00:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.178.55/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp2s0
valid_lft 862758sec preferred_lft 862758sec
inet6 2003:ce:5f08:8600:6ae7:3d2d:fe1d:c940/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 7101sec preferred_lft 1700sec
inet6 fe80::d017:c5ae:2734:c531/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:23:24:5b:b4:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s25
inet 10.10.10.2/24 brd 10.10.10.255 scope global noprefixroute eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306915
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
And this is ip a with the 4 lines in /etc/network/
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0a:cd:00:00:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.178.55/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp2s0
valid_lft 863931sec preferred_lft 863931sec
inet6 2003:ce:5f08:8600:6ae7:3d2d:fe1d:c940/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 7132sec preferred_lft 1118sec
inet6 fe80::d017:c5ae:2734:c531/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:23:24:5b:b4:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s25
inet 10.10.10.2/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::223:24ff:fe5b:b4ac/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
why does it change the altname to enp0s25? that is a conflict with 2. where can I change the altname manually to fix this?
Or should I change the priorities so that eno1 is launched before enp2?
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0a:cd:00:00:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.178.55/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp2s0
valid_lft 863931sec preferred_lft 863931sec
inet6 2003:ce:5f08:8600:6ae7:3d2d:fe1d:c940/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 7132sec preferred_lft 1118sec
inet6 fe80::d017:c5ae:2734:c531/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:23:24:5b:b4:ac brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp0s25
inet 10.10.10.2/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::223:24ff:fe5b:b4ac/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
why does it change the altname to enp0s25? that is a conflict with 2. where can I change the altname manually to fix this?
Or should I change the priorities so that eno1 is launched before enp2?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306916
by Muftijaja
Replied by Muftijaja on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
Hmm I tried both, changed priorities eno1 to 1 and auto/enp2 to 0 - no effect.
Then I changed the position of the lines in /etc/network/interfaces - no effect at all.
On what reason ever, the network definitions are faulty.
WTF is going on there?
Then I changed the position of the lines in /etc/network/interfaces - no effect at all.
On what reason ever, the network definitions are faulty.
WTF is going on there?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2 years 2 months ago #306917
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Latency Test OK, dennoch Fehlermeldung
The only thing that I see is different is the netmask
you might try
address 10.10.10.2/24
Also ipv6 has been enabled, which is really odd
you might try
address 10.10.10.2/24
Also ipv6 has been enabled, which is really odd
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.071 seconds
