- Posts: 41
- Thank you received: 0
Testing slaved axes under stepconf
11 years 1 week ago #63912
by geoffs
Testing slaved axes under stepconf was created by geoffs
I just had a heart stopping moment where I thought that one of the drivers in my G540 had bitten the dust.
I had a basic config running last night, machine (X-Carve) has dual Y axis motors connected to Y and A on the G540. It worked under Linuxcnc but was a bit slow so this morning decided to run some speed tests under stepconf.
Only one Y axis motor moved. I swapped cables and was about to open up the G540 to swap driver boards when I decided to test again using linuxcnc. Both motors move as expected.
It seems that when you do an axis test under stepconf, any slaving configuration is ignored and just the first Y axis entry is used. I did a bit of browsing but couldn't find anything to confirm this.
Has anyone else had a similar experience? Running LinuxCNC 2.7
Geoff
I had a basic config running last night, machine (X-Carve) has dual Y axis motors connected to Y and A on the G540. It worked under Linuxcnc but was a bit slow so this morning decided to run some speed tests under stepconf.
Only one Y axis motor moved. I swapped cables and was about to open up the G540 to swap driver boards when I decided to test again using linuxcnc. Both motors move as expected.
It seems that when you do an axis test under stepconf, any slaving configuration is ignored and just the first Y axis entry is used. I did a bit of browsing but couldn't find anything to confirm this.
Has anyone else had a similar experience? Running LinuxCNC 2.7
Geoff
Please Log in to join the conversation.
11 years 1 week ago #63921
by cncbasher
Replied by cncbasher on topic Testing slaved axes under stepconf
thats possible as stepconf is only meant as a starting point and cannot cover all combinations of axes .
and does not know over changes you have made in the hal file
stepconf is just a starting point , to get you going
and does not know over changes you have made in the hal file
stepconf is just a starting point , to get you going
Please Log in to join the conversation.
11 years 1 week ago #63930
by geoffs
Replied by geoffs on topic Testing slaved axes under stepconf
That makes sense. A bit of trap for the inexperienced though.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Jason Arnold
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 8 months ago #69910
by Jason Arnold
Yep, caught me out and had me scratching my head for a while. Using exactly the same G540 and two Y axis steppers as you.
Perhaps a bold note in the documentation or even a note in the stepconfig GUI would be a worthwhile addition in the future?
Cheers,
Jason.
Replied by Jason Arnold on topic Testing slaved axes under stepconf
geoffs wrote: That makes sense. A bit of trap for the inexperienced though.
Yep, caught me out and had me scratching my head for a while. Using exactly the same G540 and two Y axis steppers as you.
Perhaps a bold note in the documentation or even a note in the stepconfig GUI would be a worthwhile addition in the future?
Cheers,
Jason.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
10 years 8 months ago #69977
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic Testing slaved axes under stepconf
How was the second y axis configured using stepconf?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Jason Arnold
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 20
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 8 months ago #70017
by Jason Arnold
Cheers,
Jason.
Replied by Jason Arnold on topic Testing slaved axes under stepconf
Take a look at the photo attached. To get everything working as it should the one of the Y axis had to be inverted as did the E stop in at pin 15.cmorley wrote: How was the second y axis configured using stepconf?
Cheers,
Jason.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
10 years 8 months ago #70029
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic Testing slaved axes under stepconf
Yes The test code only looks for the first pin with the axis name in it.
I'll think about what could be done about that.
Chris M
I'll think about what could be done about that.
Chris M
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.097 seconds
