- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
Random stuff, reduction, servo motors, ideas and thoughts
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
i will have to mess around with it some more tomorrow. China strikes again
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
going down to 48V is noticeable from 70V but it is what it is i guess
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
i guess the moral of the story is maybe grease is not good for linear motion slides and a way oil might be better suited? i think the grease kept the balls from rolling and caused some problems. i also seen some bad signs on the bearing blocks for the long axis, looked like the plating on the ball bearings was starting to flake off. so since i had to rework some stuff i went over that with a fine tooth comb to avoid it from happening again. put a new ball nut and new bearing blocks on this thing.
this is turning into the never ending build from hell
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
what i found was the MC-60 speed control board and a 2.5 hp DC motor only problem is this thing is old and the manufacture is not around anymore as far as i can tell? i was trying to figure out how much torque this motor has? taking the info from the ID tag i'm guess it is rated at somewhere around 2.5 Nm ? does this sound about right ? and the original mini mill motor i was putting at about .9 Nm
looking at a way to drive things i can reduce the speed to about 4000 rpm from 7100 rpm or do 5500 from 7100 rpm if this thing is big enough to do away with the high and low range. i would like to do a 1 to 1 ratio and get the full 7100 rpm but i doubt i would have much luck in the torque department in slow speeds?
it was interesting to see the two motors side by side since they are close to the same size but as you can see the specs are quite different
Attachment not found
Attachment not found
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Play around with cutter sizes and materials to figure out if the motor could drive directly.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
i did not even think about direct drive so i will look at that option so thanks for the input. i'm not sure if i can do it or not though since the flange at the base is so big on this treadmill motor.
any kind of spindle speed gain would be a huge bonus even an extra 1100 make a big difference in material removal rates.
if things work well at 5300 then your idea would be he next step.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
so if this new motor has enough torque on the bottom end it will be a single pulley set up rather than the step pulley like the original and should top out at around 5,300 RPM. should be a safe starting point to play around with i hope
Attachment not found
Attachment not found
Attachment not found
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
figured i would post a picture of the drive system i was thinking so see if anyone had any feedback.
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
2.5 hp ≈ 1.86 kWmachinedude wrote: what i found was the MC-60 speed control board and a 2.5 hp DC motor only problem is this thing is old and the manufacture is not around anymore as far as i can tell? i was trying to figure out how much torque this motor has? taking the info from the ID tag i'm guess it is rated at somewhere around 2.5 Nm ? does this sound about right ?
7100 rev/min ≈ 743.5 radians/s
1.86 [kW]/743.5 [radians/s] ≈ 2.0 Nm - so 2.5 Nm was a good guess!
The power on the nameplate is probably electrical (input) power, so you need to reduce the torque accordingly. If the motor is 90 % efficient then 1.8 Nm.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- machinedude
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 715
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
