X wear Z wear inTooltable gmoccapy

Excuse me if the question is stupid ,
is it possible in tool table to introduce field correction tool wear .
or to make a separate table for wear ? For example PathPilot :



G43 Tool offset G43.2 Tool wear ??
P.S. Only for Lathe

:woohoo: I update gmoccapy and I was pleasantly surprised



there instruction for lathe ?

Looking for answer alone , I noticed that the need to wear numbers above 99999 .
Then included in the table







Is this correct ???? better and automat

The tool editor widget you see there is made to display wear offsets according to Fanuc standards.
a tool number >= 10000 is a wear offset.

But to use wear offsets requires you to use remap code to redirect tool changes to add wear offsets properly.
There is a sample config that uses shows one way to remap this way.
look for sim/axis/lathe_fanucy

According to the readme
T0101 would load tool 1, load tool offsets for tool 1 and add wear offsets of tool 10001
T0201 would load tool 1, load tool offset for tool 1 and add waer offset for tool 10002
Which I believe is backwards from most Fanuc but can be changed.
you also don't need to add m6 or G43/g43.2 commands

Chris M

Thinking about it, I guess you don't actually need to use remap.

T1 m6 g43 h1
g43.2 h10001

would be the same as T0101 (tool one, wear offset one)
Chris M

cmorley wrote: Thinking about it, I guess you don't actually need to use remap.

T1 m6 g43 h1
g43.2 h10001

would be the same as T0101 (tool one, wear offset one)
Chris M

I hope to be so . Because now it is not so
When expected to start this version ?

I'm not sure what you mean.

What doesn't work?

cmorley wrote: I'm not sure what you mean.

What doesn't work?

Command T2 M6 --- OK
Command T0101 ---Error
Version 2.8 .0-pre1 , maybe not yet implemented tool wear ?
or I have to complement hal ??

I have not even noted, that this widget has been changed to display also wear offsets!

The documentation is here

It says, that remapping is required.
I think I should include a INI entry to hide that part, otherwise most users will be disturbed by unneeded tabs and entries.

I just pushed 2.1.4 hidding that additional tabs as default.
If you wish to use wear offsets, add to

if someone (dinkata, it is up to you ) does a documentation I can include, it may be visible as default.

And a call to all:

Please, please, please help with documentation!!!
I can give advice on how to do that!
I am running out of time!

Norbert

Norbert

dinkata wrote:

cmorley wrote: I'm not sure what you mean.

What doesn't work?

Attachment not found

Command T2 M6 --- OK
Command T0101 ---Error
Version 2.8 .0-pre1 , maybe not yet implemented tool wear ?
or I have to complement hal ??

As I stated:
To use T0101 as the command to use wear offsets requires you to use remap programming.
Doing it directly with G43.2 will always work.

Chris M