- Posts: 174
- Thank you received: 0
NativeCAM is Features renamed
gene@GO704:~/linuxcnc/configs/GO704fast$ ncam --ini=GO704Fast.ini --catalog=mill
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ncam", line 5150, in <module>
verify_ini(os.path.abspath(ini), catalog, in_tab)
File "/usr/bin/ncam", line 4952, in verify_ini
with open(fname, 'r') as b :
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/gene/linuxcnc/configs/GO704fast/GO704Fast.ini'
And that IS the exact path to that .ini file. ??? Is there a fix, or do I blow this whole tree away and git-clone it?
Cheers, Gene1934
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page < geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene >
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Earlier I did exactly that but did not see an effect. What I missed is that the "Mirror items" component comes up de-activated per default. I changed that behaviour in cfg/mill/polyline-mirror-i.cfg. Thanks for your help.FernV wrote: . In your case what you need is "Elemente spiegeln" (Mirror items) and place it after the elements you want to miror like this image.
Regards,
Karl
Please Log in to join the conversation.
kjacobs wrote: Hi Fern,
Earlier I did exactly that but did not see an effect. What I missed is that the "Mirror items" component comes up de-activated per default. I changed that behaviour in cfg/mill/polyline-mirror-i.cfgFernV wrote: . In your case what you need is "Elemente spiegeln" (Mirror items) and place it after the elements you want to miror like this image.
Having active by default made it very confusing in many case, wondering what was happening. I think re-ordering parameters with defining the mirror line first then activate would help.
Attachment not found
Instead of changing cfg/mill/polyline-mirror-i.cfg, right click and save values as your custom defaults after you changed parameters in ncam. Those defaults will be read every time you use cfg/mill/polyline-mirror-i.cfg or any other cfg file.
Attachment not found
Fern
P.S. in next release, when not active, no parameters will be visible (except active of course)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks & Cheers, Gene1934
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page < geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene >
Please Log in to join the conversation.
all I did was follow message # 94274 of this forum, then type ncam -h to get instructions how to embed into your ini-file.
Updates to new versions of NativeCAM after that are as easy as sudo apt-get update & sudo apt-get install nativecam
See forum.linuxcnc.org/40-subroutines-and-ng...w?limitstart=0#94274
Karl
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks & Cheers to both of you.
Gene1934
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page < geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene >
Please Log in to join the conversation.
This is also for anyone wanting to learn more about polyline.
I created a demo on simpler and simplest ways to create a DSub cutout. Information is in the Project description
Fern
Please Log in to join the conversation.
that is very instructive, thank you! I should have thought earlier about the link types for polylines,which shows that I am still on the steep part of the learning curve. What I do not quite get though is how you arrived at the radii and lengths of the polylines to get to the same final dimensions as my "complicated" version that I constructed from published drawings ( www.norcomp.net/dsub-panel-cutouts ). I used the 3.35mm radius given there for example and you use 3.327mm, and also I do not find a relation of the line length of the bottom straight part to the value (C) in the drawing. Actually, if I shift my "complicated" version by 50.8+3.335mm to compare the versions, there is a tiny height difference, but the radii look identical on the backplot. (I used the shift of -3.335mm to have the centerline at y0 which makes it a bit simpler to offset the cutout to a given position). So in short, my question is how to arrive at given dimensions with the "simplest" version.
Cheers,
Karl
Please Log in to join the conversation.
In fact, I just superposed just to get about the same dimensions but here how to do it, it is just a little trigonometrykjacobs wrote: ... how you arrived at the radii and lengths of the polylines to get to the same final
You just need to find the intersections of the straight lines and then apply the indicated radius
Attachment not found
I used the dimensions for a 25 pins and the calculation is simple as you can see. If it is not clear enough, ask for more details.
Attachment not found
P.S. lower angle is NOT 40° but 50°
Attachment not found
Regards
Fern
Please Log in to join the conversation.
understood! On the other hand, now that "simplest" does not mean "least brainpower" anymore, I'd rather call your construction method "ingenious" from now on
For the final version of the D-Sub 25 the two mounting holes would have to be added, which is of course trivial.
Happy Holidays,
Karl
Edit: I did find a small quirk with your last version. If you try to set tool compensation to "left", there is an error concerning the entry move (3mm or 2mm cutter dia). If you flip it in X (long side on the bottom), it works, but it looks to me like part of the entry move is outside of the contour and would spoil the cutout. I think that does not happen in my "complicated" version because it starts to cut at the straight section. I am sure you will show me again what I missed...
Please Log in to join the conversation.
