- Posts: 233
- Thank you received: 0
Thc disable
4 years 7 months ago #238279
by paulsao
Replied by paulsao on topic Thc disable
The first test
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2580
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 7 months ago #238280
by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic Thc disable
Awesome! Looks great!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
4 years 7 months ago #238288
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Thc disable
Left side more offset, not sure how big the machine is (also not sure how it is oriented), but seems like at least 2 or 3mm more offset on the left side.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
4 years 7 months ago #238292
by paulsao
Replied by paulsao on topic Thc disable
Look at the first photo, not the second, which is as you say, there is about 3 mm of error.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2580
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 7 months ago #238294
by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic Thc disable
Well, that's what I get for looking at it on my phone earlier hahaha, I didnt even notice it needed more offset, I thought he was showing he got it right. Oops. :blush:Left side more offset, not sure how big the machine is (also not sure how it is oriented), but seems like at least 2 or 3mm more offset on the left side.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
4 years 7 months ago #238295
by paulsao
Replied by paulsao on topic Thc disable
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2580
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 7 months ago #238296
by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic Thc disable
Am I losing it? I swear that’s the pic I saw earlier haha. I’ll Blame the editor for playing tricks on me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
either way, looks great, for real this time
either way, looks great, for real this time
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
4 years 7 months ago #238298
by tommylight

-
I did see the first pic and it was very close to perfect or perfect (hard to tell from a skewed pic), but then the second pic happened ...
To have it exactly, it does need to be checked on a much bigger area, i tend to use almost all the cutting area so when i get the diagonals to be within 1mm, i consider that "perfect".
Replied by tommylight on topic Thc disable
Luckily i was looking at it on a 32" monitor, otherwise ....Well, that's what I get for looking at it on my phone earlier hahaha, I didnt even notice it needed more offset, I thought he was showing he got it right. Oops. :blush:
-
I did see the first pic and it was very close to perfect or perfect (hard to tell from a skewed pic), but then the second pic happened ...
To have it exactly, it does need to be checked on a much bigger area, i tend to use almost all the cutting area so when i get the diagonals to be within 1mm, i consider that "perfect".
Please Log in to join the conversation.
4 years 7 months ago #238300
by paulsao
Replied by paulsao on topic Thc disable
My table is 2.40 meters long and 1.50 meters wide. I think the best way would be to make diagonals?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
4 years 7 months ago #238301
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Thc disable
You make a square and measure diagonals of that square, they must be equal.
While measuring diagonals, mind the side of the tape measure and the side of the square being measured, misplacing the tape measure will give incorrect results.
While measuring diagonals, mind the side of the tape measure and the side of the square being measured, misplacing the tape measure will give incorrect results.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.661 seconds
