- Posts: 5712
- Thank you received: 0
New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
6 years 7 months ago #161954
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
I think the runtest fails should be fixed before getting too far ahead, they obviously indicate a problem/problems somewhere.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161958
by rodw
Seems Issues $134, #177 and #283 refer. I think Andy is on the job as #283 was committed 19 hours ago to the official state-tags branch. The notes in the first test says it will be fixed by release of State tags and referred to #134. Talk about going around in circles for years!
Replied by rodw on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
phillc54 wrote: I think the runtest fails should be fixed before getting too far ahead, they obviously indicate a problem/problems somewhere.
Seems Issues $134, #177 and #283 refer. I think Andy is on the job as #283 was committed 19 hours ago to the official state-tags branch. The notes in the first test says it will be fixed by release of State tags and referred to #134. Talk about going around in circles for years!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #162043
by cmorley
Replied by cmorley on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
Well I tried a rverse-feedcode-2.8 mix branch and it seems to have worked ok.
I's like to discuss if that's a tolerable idea - but I think Andy is the only other developer to talk to about this ...
usually I would discuss this on the mail list (where it should be).
Chris
I's like to discuss if that's a tolerable idea - but I think Andy is the only other developer to talk to about this ...
usually I would discuss this on the mail list (where it should be).
Chris
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #162163
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
Lets take it to the dev list. Perhaps Zultron will chip in?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #162182
by rodw
Thanks Andy. There seems to be no reason why reverse run can't be pushed back to 2.8 as its been in master branch for over 12 months so its probably the most extensively tested new feature ever suggested for release.
Replied by rodw on topic New pin motion.base-feedrate in master branch
andypugh wrote: Lets take it to the dev list. Perhaps Zultron will chip in?
Thanks Andy. There seems to be no reason why reverse run can't be pushed back to 2.8 as its been in master branch for over 12 months so its probably the most extensively tested new feature ever suggested for release.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.282 seconds
