Hypersensing questions

Why not just call your first contact break the contact break and be done with it, nice and simple...

phillc54 wrote: Why not just call your first contact break the contact break and be done with it, nice and simple...

Thats essentially what we are doing but to counter noise, the moving average confirms there is a downward trend first. Kinda like a debounce..... but we will be doing that confirming debounce before we get back to the threshold.

The goal is reliability not simplicity.

rodw wrote:

phillc54 wrote: Why not just call your first contact break the contact break and be done with it, nice and simple...

Thats essentially what we are doing but to counter noise, the moving average confirms there is a downward trend first. Kinda like a debounce..... but we will be doing that confirming debounce before we get back to the threshold.

The goal is reliability not simplicity.

Of course, but I think you should get a bit more data from the other guys at step 1 before moving too many steps ahead.

phillc54 wrote: Of course, but I think you should get a bit more data from the other guys at step 1 before moving too many steps ahead.

I have not actually moved any steps ahead since I made some changes on the weekend. We will all get there..

Rod, just so we're all on the same page I'm going to update the ohmic component I'm testing with.

I took your ohmic2.comp from page 7 and made the edits per page 8:

rodw wrote: to change the component under case 1: from

Code:

if(ohmic_volts > ohmic_threshold){

to

Code:

if(avgvolts > ohmic_threshold){

Is that all I need to do to be current with your setup? comp attached

I'll vary N and report back.

Woo hoo! Should be able to rejoin the party tomorrow/this weekend:

Uthayne wrote:
Is that all I need to do to be current with your setup? comp attached

I'll vary N and report back.

I'll share the version I am using later today as I think I made some changes. That will be a few hours from now. Its obscenely early here)

rodw wrote: That will be a few hours from now. Its obscenely early here)

I was just wondering about that, is it to early or to late, but now i know. Was it 10 or 11 hours difference ?

tommylight wrote:

rodw wrote: That will be a few hours from now. Its obscenely early here)

I was just wondering about that, is it to early or to late, but now i know. Was it 10 or 11 hours difference ?

Yeh 10-11 hours for you (we are GMT+10) So are are about 15 hours ahead of the US which has a very unfriendly time zone for an aussie.

I did recall, it is 11 hours as i said to a friend the day we spoke on the phone that you live in the opposite side of the world, literally !
Ooops, i did forget one L on recall, guess what autocorrect suggested !