- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 0
qtdragon - new tool length after a manual tool change
- seebaer1976
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
would declare myself ready to test when the time comes.
unfortunately i have no idea about python, i'm learning it.
markus
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 0
what was changed? The last change of qtdragon was on github 12 days ago.
interested would like to test it
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Open post # 168892 on link, download, run and you will see three options there.seebaer1976 wrote: hi hottabich,
what was changed? The last change of qtdragon was on github 12 days ago.
interested would like to test it
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 0
hottabich wrote: Open post # 168892 on link, download, run and you will see three options there.
Hi,
looks good, but unfortunately too big.
unfortunately only have a resolution of 1440x900.
making smaller is not possible, otherwise the arrangement will be lost or?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Is QtDragon original right for you? QtDragon is missing the Mdi Touchy widget for macros, I think so.What is your opinion? Is this option as in the screenshot suitable?seebaer1976 wrote:
hottabich wrote: Open post # 168892 on link, download, run and you will see three options there.
Hi,
looks good, but unfortunately too big.
unfortunately only have a resolution of 1440x900.
making smaller is not possible, otherwise the arrangement will be lost or?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 0
the original qtdragon is just the right size.
think the mditouchy is not the right one.
the only thing missing is a remap m6 macro, which in the case of a milling process with several tools, measures the new tool again after clamping and adjusts the offset against the reference tool.
as I post forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/39423-qtdragon-...hange?start=0#173125 and forum.linuxcnc.org/qtvcp/39423-qtdragon-...hange?start=0#173323 times.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- seebaer1976
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 0
just do not get the macro right, the difference is calculated correctly
since we calculated something somewhere again, either in linuxcnc itself or with qtdragon.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
