- Posts: 48
- Thank you received: 0
Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
6 years 7 months ago #161719
by rdeeming
Replied by rdeeming on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
To be perfectly transparent here, I actually had to look up qtvcp.. That's how shallow my knowledge of linuxcnc is right now.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- BeagleBrainz
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
6 years 7 months ago #161721
by BeagleBrainz
Replied by BeagleBrainz on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
Not really a necessity, I just threw it in as a convenience, for those that wanted\need it.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161723
by PCW
Ahh this is a relatively low powered PC, the Ethernet performance is probably more related to that than the
Realtek driver (which I have not noticed any real issues with)
What does
latency-histogram --nobase -- sbinsize 1000
show?
Replied by PCW on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
I checked the BIOS on this ZBOXNANO-AD12 PC and its as up to date as possible. Version 2K131128.
Ahh this is a relatively low powered PC, the Ethernet performance is probably more related to that than the
Realtek driver (which I have not noticed any real issues with)
What does
latency-histogram --nobase -- sbinsize 1000
show?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161724
by rdeeming
Replied by rdeeming on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
Attachment not found
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161726
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
Right so there's considerable native jitter being added to the ping times
Here's the same plot from the system with the ping times I posted:
Note that that has isolcpus=3 but that does not make much difference on this machine
Here's the same plot from the system with the ping times I posted:
Attachment not found
Note that that has isolcpus=3 but that does not make much difference on this machine
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161727
by rdeeming
Replied by rdeeming on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
Is what I am building on projected to be a problem down the road for a 3 axis config?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
- Away
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22012
- Thank you received: 3
6 years 7 months ago #161733
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
You are moving slowly towards the deep end !rdeeming wrote: To be perfectly transparent here, I actually had to look up qtvcp.. That's how shallow my knowledge of linuxcnc is right now.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161743
by PCW
It should not really be an issue, worst case is that it cannot do a 1 KHz servo thread, but 750 0r 500 Hz is OK for most
applications
Replied by PCW on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
rdeeming wrote: Is what I am building on projected to be a problem down the road for a 3 axis config?
It should not really be an issue, worst case is that it cannot do a 1 KHz servo thread, but 750 0r 500 Hz is OK for most
applications
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 7 months ago #161745
by rdeeming
Replied by rdeeming on topic Mach3 -> Camtronics -> Parallel P Replacement
I dug another system out of the basement.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.070 seconds
