Bridgeport TorqueCut-22 Conversion

More
2 years 6 months ago #298867 by andypugh
If VG is actually Velocity _command_ gain, then it is the same as FF1.
The following user(s) said Thank You: arsenix

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 5 months ago - 2 years 5 months ago #301038 by arsenix
I did some prodding of the interfaces over the weekend. This machine has two auxilliary I/O boards called the "AUF" (auxilliary functions) and the "LCTCAUF" (Low Cost Tool Change AUF), both of which are connected over serial. The maint manual describes the interface to these but there are already some discrepancies. The manual said they were 9600 bps and used RS485 in a multidrop config. They clearly use 38400bps and are RS422 with independent TX/RX pairs to either board. The boards appear to support RS485 but this machine doesn't use that configuration. If more than two are required maybe it was supported.

In any case the protocol was not as obvious as I was hoping. In both cases the units send packets to each other that start with a unique packet magic byte (0x23 or 0x29 for the AUF and 0x26 for the LCTLAUF), payload bytes that all appear to be 0x3_ or 0x6_ and some sort of checksum byte that is always 0x4_. The packets are firing at about 50Hz. The 4 bit "checksum" appears to be additive in some way but I have not been able to discern the algorithm used. Turning the coolant on off caused a single bit to flip on the outbound packet to the AUF as well as a change in the checksum byte. The LCTLAUF has a fairly small outbound packet but also has a counter in the packets for some reason. Decoding all the error states in particular might be a challenge. An AUF packets at startup for the curious:
 

Although elegant to reverse engineer these and have a "wiring free" conversion I'm sure it would be easier to replace or modify these boards with Mesa Smart Serial I/O endpoints. It is quite nice to be able to switch back and force between controls though easily especially if the conversion takes a while. Something to ponder.
Last edit: 2 years 5 months ago by arsenix. Reason: screwing with the image!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 3 months ago #305304 by jmelson
I fairly recently did a retrofit on a Bridgeport R2E3 mill. I think it is one generation earlier than the machines with the BMDC, but the servo side is fairly similar. My machine had Contraves NC400 servo amps that make a maddening whine, so I replaced them with AMC brush-type servo amps. I used the original motor/tach units, and originally used the stock encoders, too. These encoders were 250-line resolution. They caused some servo hunting noise, and one unit was contaminated. So, I eventually replaced all the encoders with eBay knockoffs labeled Omron, with 2500 line resolution. I used my own PPMC interface board set (full disclosure - I make these as Pico Systems). I also added a spindle encoder so I can do rigid tapping. It all works incredibly well!
After some issues with properly programming a cheap Chinese VFD, I ended up getting an Automation Direct unit that came with a real manual.
Jon

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.105 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum