- Posts: 90
- Thank you received: 0
Validating LinuxCNC Post for Autodesk CAM
- yoshimitsuspeed
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
yoshimitsuspeed wrote: If you have employees who will be paid to use the software then you will loose more time and money paying them to deal with crashes, bugs, glitches, lack of features and switching over to other CAD programs to fill in the gaps than you would spend on a better CAD package. In the latter case I would bite the bullet and buy something that is better developed and more capable.
I am only really recommending it for CAM. It definitely isn't pro-level CAD.
But, if you are in that position, Inventor + CAM is £7500 and that is probably what you would choose.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
andypugh wrote: But, if you are in that position, Inventor + CAM is £7500 and that is probably what you would choose.
Reading that review, maybe _you_ wouldn't, but I would as I was a full-time CAD designer in a previous job and used Inventor 8 hours a day. I would probably find the CAD that you find intuitive totally unintuitive...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- yoshimitsuspeed
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 90
- Thank you received: 0
I wish there were more good options for Linux. I have to run Windows on a couple machines solely for CAD.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It is from the original Solidworks team, is online, and works with most browsers.
I don't know if there is a CAM plugin yet.
Ray M.
"No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it"
Albert Einstein
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- yoshimitsuspeed
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 90
- Thank you received: 0
RayJr wrote: Have you tried out Onshape? (onshape.com)
It is from the original Solidworks team, is online, and works with most browsers.
I don't know if there is a CAM plugin yet.
Ray M.
I have a little bit.
One big thing is that I started F360 before they came out with ultimate and am therefore grandfathered in to $360/year for the ultimate version.
Onshape is like $1600 per year and has no CAM. I spent about 10 minutes on their forum researching whether they had plans for it and realized that their dev team seemed like just a big of aholes as AD and that they firmly believed that they didn't want to integrate CAM.
For that much money with no CAM I'd probably just get Solid Edge or something.
I have spent a little time playing with it and it seems like they took a slightly different approach.
Autodesk wanted a big flashy program that drew people in so they focused on cool attention getters like simulation, CAM, rendering and a bunch of other things that work okay but are taking ever to improve because they have so much going on. This has also led to serious stability issues.
It seems like Onshape took more of a one thing at a time approach. I have heard that it is much more stable and that there are some things some people like better like the sketching environment however it is not very capable either. I definitely don't see it being capable enough to justify the cost.
I have learned my lesson with F360. If I left it I would do it for stable software that has been proven to be production ready instead of falling for a new brands false promises of being production ready when they are far from it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.