Closing the servo loop with HAL mesa 7i76

More
6 years 8 months ago #158225 by PCW
Yeah I would not mess with the tuning but rather set all the various filter times to their minimums

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 8 months ago #158226 by Clive S

Todd Zuercher wrote: Those pertain to tuning the position loop in the drive (something that may need done). But not directly to the velocity or acceleration limits.


I have changed the PD113 to 10 then 20 then 30 and 30 seems to have improved I upped the acc to 1100 now I can move at vel 1490 with G0 X500 X0 without the following error.

I will post the halscope plot tomorrow. Still not to sure how to use it properly yet

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 8 months ago #158804 by Clive S
OK I have had a chance to try and tune the servo fro the following errors. (The motor is on the bench)
Re: the screen shot what do I need to adjust and what should I be looking for?

This was moving at about 50mm 14000m/min

Attachment not found

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • thefabricator03
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
6 years 8 months ago #158806 by thefabricator03
Replied by thefabricator03 on topic Closing the servo loop with HAL mesa 7i76
Since changing the settings in the drive, are you still getting following errors?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 8 months ago #158812 by tommylight
Close but no cigar ! :)
At that speed you are still getting about 400ms of total delay.
Have a look at the first post here, where the wiring ends and the tuning starts, right above the :fine tuning: part.
That should get you very close to acceptable very fast.
forum.linuxcnc.org/10-advanced-configura...ning-detailed-how-to

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 8 months ago #158814 by PCW
The fact that you are getting huge errors (> 1.5 mm) means the drive tuning is still way off
Did you set all the drives filter time constants to their minimums?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 8 months ago #158825 by Clive S

thefabricator03 wrote: Since changing the settings in the drive, are you still getting following errors?

Yes . I have now changed them back. Thanks for taking an interest

At that speed you are still getting about 400ms of total delay.
Have a look at the first post here, where the wiring ends and the tuning starts, right above the :fine tuning: part.
That should get you very close to acceptable very fast.
forum.linuxcnc.org/10-advanced-configura...ning-detailed-how-to


I am not sure how to read the plot. I have been studying the tutorial. (mine is step/dir)

The fact that you are getting huge errors (> 1.5 mm) means the drive tuning is still way off
Did you set all the drives filter time constants to their minimums?

Thanks Peter I have tried to fathom the manual but not sure which parameters to change.

manual: www.dropbox.com/s/jp7t9hcszjcg6na/1.8Kw%...vo%20manual.pdf?dl=0

New plot over 200mm

Attachment not found

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • thefabricator03
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
6 years 7 months ago #158858 by thefabricator03
Replied by thefabricator03 on topic Closing the servo loop with HAL mesa 7i76

Clive S wrote:

thefabricator03 wrote: Since changing the settings in the drive, are you still getting following errors?

Yes . I have now changed them back. Thanks for taking an interest


I am about to start a project with up to 9 motors, some closed loop steppers and some servos. I plan on doing what you are doing and closing the loop within LinuxCNC. I am sure the issues and responses here will be very relevant to my situation when I get started.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 7 months ago #158861 by PCW
I would set Pn110,111,112,114 to their minimums and see if that improves the tracking

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
6 years 7 months ago #158883 by Clive S

PCW wrote: I would set Pn110,111,112,114 to their minimums and see if that improves the tracking


Peter many thanks for looking into this.

Pn109 is set for zero which I think disables Pn110,111,112 not sure if it affects 114.

But I will of course try those settings.

My Naz drives MB has failed and I am trying to get the data off the raid HD's which is going to take me some time.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.981 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum