MTConnect support actively developed?

More
11 months 1 week ago #338642 by terkaa81
Hi,

  Is someone actively developing MTConnect support? If someone is working on this, maybe I could join the effort?  My goal would be to establish MTConnect similar to Haas, and perhaps also the MDC support for Q commands. 

P.S. Some of you might remember my previous project: installing LinuxCNC on a Cincinnati 10HC2500 HMC.

Tero

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
11 months 1 week ago #338731 by andypugh
I don't know of anyone working on that, but loobric.com/blog/introducing-smooth-tool-data-sync might be of interest / related

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
11 months 1 week ago #338734 by Aciera

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
11 months 1 week ago #338738 by terkaa81
Hi,

Yes, that's why I asked about active development, should have mentioned that post :) If I manage to make something useful, does it matter if the code uses Python API or is written in C? 

Tero

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
11 months 2 days ago #339388 by andypugh
If you are writing an interpreter to plug into LinuxCNC than it should probably be written in the same language as the existing one. That isn't to say that Python couldn't be made to work (I don't actually know) but there would be more to copy and adapt in C++

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.081 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum