Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test

That's odd, AFAIK all Intel drivers have settable coalesce parameters

This is my hardware:
Hardware Class: network interface
Model: "Ethernet network interface"
Driver: "e1000e"
Driver Modules: "e1000e"
Device File: eno1

and the result of ethtool -c eno1:
Coalesce parameters for eno1:
Adaptive RX: off TX: off
stats-block-usecs: 0
sample-interval: 0
pkt-rate-low: 0
pkt-rate-high: 0

rx-usecs: 0
rx-frames: 0
rx-usecs-irq: 0
rx-frames-irq: 0

tx-usecs: 0
tx-frames: 0
tx-usecs-irq: 0
tx-frames-irq: 0

rx-usecs-low: 0
rx-frames-low: 0
tx-usecs-low: 0
tx-frames-low: 0

rx-usecs-high: 0
rx-frames-high: 0
tx-usecs-high: 0
tx-frames-high: 0

PCW wrote:

That's odd, AFAIK all Intel drivers have settable coalesce parameters

This is my hardware:
Hardware Class: network interface
Model: "Ethernet network interface"
Driver: "e1000e"
Driver Modules: "e1000e"
Device File: eno1

and the result of ethtool -c eno1:
Coalesce parameters for eno1:
Adaptive RX: off TX: off
stats-block-usecs: 0
sample-interval: 0
pkt-rate-low: 0
pkt-rate-high: 0

rx-usecs: 0
rx-frames: 0
rx-usecs-irq: 0
rx-frames-irq: 0

tx-usecs: 0
tx-frames: 0
tx-usecs-irq: 0
tx-frames-irq: 0

rx-usecs-low: 0
rx-frames-low: 0
tx-usecs-low: 0
tx-frames-low: 0

rx-usecs-high: 0
rx-frames-high: 0
tx-usecs-high: 0
tx-frames-high: 0
 

With the Realtek card also nothing is displayed, the same as with my Intel card.

Sure you have the correct device?

PCW wrote:

Sure you have the correct device?
 

 

Do not create a new connection, edit the existing one.
Linux is very good at having several network connections on a single ethernet port, and that may cause issues when using internet browsers while the machine is on.

tommylight wrote:

Do not create a new connection, edit the existing one.
Linux is very good at having several network connections on a single ethernet port, and that may cause issues when using internet browsers while the machine is on.

I have 2 connections:

1. enp3s0 (home network)
2. enp4s0 (for the mesa card)

The only thing I have configured on the connections is the name and IP address.

Should I do something different?

All good, changing the name of the existing connection is OK.
While at it, disable IPV6 for the LinuxCNC connection, set IPV4 to manual and type the IP.

Is switched off, I don't use IPv6 in my whole network

WKS-3D wrote:

I have 2 connections:

1. enp3s0 (home network)
2. enp4s0 (for the mesa card)

Can you share the output from typing: ip a
The screen dump is not terribly useful so we still don't know how you have set up your Network interfaces.

I recommend you follow the docs
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.9/html/getting-start...s_only_for_mesa_card  

rodw wrote:

WKS-3D wrote:

I have 2 connections:

1. enp3s0 (home network)
2. enp4s0 (for the mesa card)

Can you share the output from typing: ip a
The screen dump is not terribly useful so we still don't know how you have set up your Network interfaces.

I recommend you follow the docs
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.9/html/getting-start...s_only_for_mesa_card  

ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 50:9a:4c:18:57:03 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.0.131/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global noprefixroute enp3s0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: enp4s0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 68:05:ca:3f:98:31 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.10.10.1/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global enp4s0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

I have done all the steps from the link.