Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test

More
3 years 2 months ago #277005 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test
3: enp4s0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000
Means nothing is connected to it, but the configuration is OK.
No carrier so the interface is down.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 2 months ago #277007 by WKS-3D
Replied by WKS-3D on topic Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test
Yes, that's correct. The mesa card is not connected 

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 2 months ago #277054 by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test
Great! so next step, type
Code:
sudo apt install ethtool ethtool -i enps04
And share the results. This will report the ethernet driver in use to confirm its an Intel device.
also connect the mesa card and type
ping 10.10.10.10

If you get a reply you should be good to go.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 2 months ago #277100 by WKS-3D
Replied by WKS-3D on topic Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test

Great! so next step, type
Code:
sudo apt install ethtool ethtool -i enps04And share the results. This will report the ethernet driver in use to confirm its an Intel device. also connect the mesa card and type ping 10.10.10.10 If you get a reply you should be good to go.
 

I had already posted thgis on page 4, but ok, here again :)
Code:
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.691 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.306 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.354 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.287 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.364 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.214 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.357 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.351 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.361 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.359 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.360 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.360 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.359 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.299 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.359 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.364 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.358 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.338 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.363 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.387 ms ^C --- 10.10.10.10 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19525ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.214/0.359/0.691/0.084 ms
Code:
driver: e1000e version: 6.1.0-10-rt-amd64 firmware-version: 1.8-0 expansion-rom-version: bus-info: 0000:04:00.0 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: yes supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: yes


 

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 2 months ago #277105 by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Neue Hardware und schlechter Latency Test
Perfect. It's hard to understand your config from a distance so thanks for going along with me.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.037 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum