- Posts: 83
- Thank you received: 0
examples outside of machine limits how to fix?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- kornphlake79
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 51
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
cmorley wrote: linuxcnc _always_ has machine limits (or called soft limits) and usually has limit/home switches.
if you don't have switches for home them you must jog to a homing point and tell linuxcnc to home based on that spot.
the spot is set in the INI file. You can't just home anywhere and expect things to work well
How did you get the config in the first place?
Have you tried the sample sim confgs ? They simulate home swicthes.
No sorry I don't think there are homing videos.
Chris M
to setup "my-mill" I followed this,
to get my config.
So linuxcnc engraves after i jog the Z down a bit as the code says.
I cant find anything called "sim"
I tried to load arcspiral.ngc and it wont run saying "linear move on line3 would exceed joint 2's positive limit" this makes no sense to me.
I couldnt get 3dchips.ngc to work but I have just reloaded it and it works..... no idea why the arcspiral.ngc doe not however.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
kornphlake79 wrote: You probably have the simulation machine setup with a very short z axis travel, it's possible that no matter what you do the program will exceed the size of the machine. You may have rapid moves or other linear moves outside of the red box, look carefully to make sure all lines, even very faint lines are inside the box. My machine only has about 2 inches a travel, I had to edit most of the sample programs to have very short feed in moves so the part would fit within my machine limits.
Thanks I think this is it. I re-ran the stepconf and I had increased the Z axis from 4 inches to 6 inches, this could explain why 3dchips now runs. I will re-run the setup and make z 10 inches and see if the spiral then works.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Todd Zuercher wrote: It isn't the size of the movement that is the problem (with 3-d chips at least) but where the movement is commanded. The first move is to Z+10mm (0.3937) and if you have not touched off Z g54 to something less than that it will give a "Program exccedes machine maximum on axis Z" alarm. The rest of the file is all Z- and the lowest that goes is -30.5mm. So the total travel used is actually about 1.6" and all that needs to be offset so it fits in the machine constraints box (red rectangle). If you change the perspective view of the preview screen to X or Y (front or side view) you can more easily see where in vertical space your tool paths lie.
Yes I have been playing with just this, and so far I have three simulations now working. It doesnt seem to be very well documented / explained.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- kornphlake79
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 51
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 4739
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- kornphlake79
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 51
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
