Z homed DRO red !

More
9 years 7 months ago #89322 by dinkata
Z homed DRO red ! was created by dinkata
I upgraded Linuxcnc 2.7 to Linuxcnc 2.8
I want a new gmoccapy :) .
After homing Z DRO remains in red !!??
I'm wrong or there is a bug ?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89440 by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Z homed DRO red !
I will check ASAP, but that screen is modified, what are the result with original lathe screen?

Norbert

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89454 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic Z homed DRO red !

what are the result with original lathe screen?

Yes original .
If we use sim gmoccapy then no problem .
If we use step wizard or pncconf then this problem .

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89464 by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Z homed DRO red !
I just checked the following:

I made a config with stepconf, using 2.7, I started that config and homed the machine: No Problem
I changed over to master and started the same config "it is then converted to 2.8 style": No problem.

Post your config!

Norbert

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89501 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic Z homed DRO red !
Hello Norbert , thanks for the reply !
I like very much gmoccapy . We work on two lathe and a milling machine.
I want to use function "tool wear" in tool table . Therefore upgraded 2.7.8 => 2.8 .
Please see,done properly ?

Attachment not found



Then I made configuration (applied)

Attachment not found


Attachment not found



P.S. After homing pin joint.0.homed = 1 , pin joint.1.homed = 0 !!??

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89506 by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Z homed DRO red !
Have a look at the [KINS] section of your .ini file and if you have this in your KINEMATICS = line try removing it.
Code:
KINSTYPE=BOTH

There have been a few changes in Master to integrate the joint axis code that had some impact on Gmocappy which were only fixed recently. When I was trying to solve a now fixed bug, I had a red axis a couple of times....

Removing the kinstype=both means that individual joint mode is disabled but that should not be an issue on a lathe.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89508 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic Z homed DRO red !
ini :

[KINS]
JOINTS = 2
KINEMATICS = trivkins coordinates=XZ

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89554 by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Z homed DRO red !
I am on my fone, but without looking in your config i do know, you are using a corrupt config.

A lathe is a identity kinematics, so you need 3 joints, X being joint 0 and Z being joint 2.
Joint 1 is unused and does not need to be in your ini file.

Change joints to 3 and rename your joint 1 to joint 2.
After that the dro problem should be gone.

Norbert

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89569 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic Z homed DRO red !
Hello Norbert , thanks for the reply !

Change joints to 3 and rename your joint 1 to joint 2.

I did this,but there is another problem .This is config real machine :
ini:
Warning: Spoiler!

hal
Warning: Spoiler!

In this configuration, when pressed the button -X or +X normal move
but when pressed the button -Z or +Z joint.2.vel-cmd =0 joint.1.vel-cmd = 3
[ jog speed = 180mm/min ( and another problem show sometimes inch/min ) ]
joint.1 error !!!!!!??????

Attachment not found

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
9 years 7 months ago #89614 by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Z homed DRO red !

dinkata wrote: ini :

[KINS]
JOINTS = 2
KINEMATICS = trivkins coordinates=XZ


I have my lathe set up as 2 joints and use the 2.8 version of LinuxCNC.

I use the Touchy GUI and have noticed that I don't get a "homed" indicator in the GUI for the Z axis.
This looks like exactly the same problem. (Except it isn't really a problem for me, and I have ignored it).

I will try some experiments tonight to see if I can see the problem.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.115 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum