- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
For PhillC regarding PlasmaC and Z axis stuff
- tommylight
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Administrator
-
I did not set G54 or any offsets. Maybe that removes the issue and that is a nice solution, and i will test that just after i get some coffee in me, as i have the test setup on the bench. And i do recall you mentioning to do a touch off. Back in a few.phillc54 wrote: Yeah, I can't see any thing wrong at the moment.
I think it is a good idea to set your G54 position at the Z minimum, that way your DRO always shows the relative height above the Z minimum.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
Will do so, just doing some more tests.phillc54 wrote: Could you post an ini file that plays up and I will have a look.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
No touch off !
Z axis ini settings: -20mm
Attachment not found
Config panel settings: Probe height = 20 , safe height = 30
Attachment not found
Result = Error on probe test.
Same ini, config settings changed to: probe height = 30, safe height = 45
Result with 3mm thick material = no error.
Result with 10mm thick material = error on probe.
Same ini, config settings changed to: probe height = 40, safe height = 50
Result with 10mm thick material = no error, safe traverse height has been reduced.
-
Set the min_limit to 0 for the Z axis, go to slats to home, press home, error :
Attachment not found
To recover, press F1, then again F1 and F2.
If by any chance it gets to 0 value on the Z axis during jogging, it will trip limit error, notify about fixing limits and restart, so not motion is possible, a restart of Linuxcnc is required.
-
With touch off just above the 3mm material, ini min_limit at 0, config probe height at 20 and safe height at 35 = works OK.
With touch off just above the 10mm material, ini min_limit at 0, config probe height at 20 and safe height at 35 = works OK.
Unfortunately i can not reproduce an error i got twice last night where is would stop all motion, error out ( do not recall the exact error ) and a restart of Linuxcnc would be required.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
Please Log in to join the conversation.
A quick look at the ini shows different values for the axis and joint max limits, I don't know if that causes any problems.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
Enjoy it !phillc54 wrote: I am digesting wine at the moment...
I am aware, it does not get to 60mm ever while testing.phillc54 wrote: A quick look at the ini shows different values for the axis and joint max limits, I don't know if that causes any problems.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
the Nema 17 at Z wont make a damage at blockend when thc likes to go down more just oversteps
Please Log in to join the conversation.
When you had z minimum at -20 do you know where the torch was in relation to the slats when you jogged z fully down.
Did you jog Z down for this.Set the min_limit to 0 for the Z axis, go to slats to home, press home, error :
I don't suppose you know what he original g54 offset was before you did the touchoff.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
to set things intirer to the known behaviors
but it is there alredy as it touched the ref switches only the new Material omic sence does a new G54 z set and then i can start from the Sheetcam zero fixed to the mashine sheet zero place
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- tommylight
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 22010
- Thank you received: 3
Just a bit under the top of the slats, or table in this case, about 3mm.phillc54 wrote: When you had z minimum at -20 do you know where the torch was in relation to the slats when you jogged z fully down.
Yes.phillc54 wrote: Did you jog Z down for this.
No offset, machine 0 at G54 0.phillc54 wrote: I don't suppose you know what he original g54 offset was before you did the touchoff.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
