- Posts: 116
- Thank you received: 33
Ohmic Probe + Material Height Feature Request
10 months 1 week ago #340409
by EW_CNC
Replied by EW_CNC on topic Ohmic Probe + Material Height Feature Request
Ok, Sounds Good.
I'll update and give it a try.
Thanks!
I'll update and give it a try.
Thanks!
The following user(s) said Thank You: snowgoer540, NWE
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2581
- Thank you received: 907
10 months 1 week ago #340465
by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic Ohmic Probe + Material Height Feature Request
I should probably mention how it's set up. You will have a spinbox for Slat Height in the Probing section, and a spinbox for Thickness in the Material section of the Parameters tab. If you set BOTH the Slat Height AND the Material Thickness, then the probe start height will change based on the material thickness.
If either Slat Height OR Material Thickness are 0, then it will default to Probe Height. A high level recommendation I have (I have not tested this in practice, yet) would be to set Probe Height to 0. When Probe Height is 0, the probe movement will begin at probe speed from the current Z position. In most, if not all, cases while running a program, this would start a 5mm (0.197") below Z maximum height, as the g-code filter automagically adds these moves by default. That means that if you forgot to set a material thickness, your probe would start from the highest point possible, and it would probably be obvious that you need to fix it, and it would be the "safest" option.
If either Slat Height OR Material Thickness are 0, then it will default to Probe Height. A high level recommendation I have (I have not tested this in practice, yet) would be to set Probe Height to 0. When Probe Height is 0, the probe movement will begin at probe speed from the current Z position. In most, if not all, cases while running a program, this would start a 5mm (0.197") below Z maximum height, as the g-code filter automagically adds these moves by default. That means that if you forgot to set a material thickness, your probe would start from the highest point possible, and it would probably be obvious that you need to fix it, and it would be the "safest" option.
The following user(s) said Thank You: EW_CNC
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 months 1 week ago #340467
by MTTI
Replied by MTTI on topic Ohmic Probe + Material Height Feature Request
Hello snowgoer540,
I had a quick question: would it be possible to also set or override the Material Thickness using magic comments in the G-code?
The idea would be to pass the material thickness directly from the CAM/post-processor, to avoid manual input and reduce the risk of forgetting to set it in the UI. This could be especially useful when running multiple materials with different thicknesses in sequence.
Regards
I had a quick question: would it be possible to also set or override the Material Thickness using magic comments in the G-code?
The idea would be to pass the material thickness directly from the CAM/post-processor, to avoid manual input and reduce the risk of forgetting to set it in the UI. This could be especially useful when running multiple materials with different thicknesses in sequence.
Regards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2581
- Thank you received: 907
10 months 1 week ago #340481
by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic Ohmic Probe + Material Height Feature Request
Yes, I updated the magic comments to include adding material thickness.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 months 1 week ago #340515
by MTTI
Replied by MTTI on topic Ohmic Probe + Material Height Feature Request
Perfect, thanks!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.048 seconds