DFX Beta..

More
08 Jun 2018 09:39 #111983 by Contract_Pilot
DFX Beta.. was created by Contract_Pilot
Anyone Care to Speculate... From Most Recent YouTube Video.
Attachments:
More
09 Jun 2018 01:26 #112035 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic DFX Beta..
What do you say? In particular, please !
More
09 Jun 2018 01:40 #112039 by smgvbest
Replied by smgvbest on topic DFX Beta..
Speculate, I'd say direct importing of DFX files myself would be the most obvious one
More
09 Jun 2018 01:50 #112040 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic DFX Beta..
Did you test at work?
More
09 Jun 2018 07:47 - 09 Jun 2018 07:50 #112059 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic DFX Beta..
Test
Attachments:
Last edit: 09 Jun 2018 07:50 by dinkata.
More
09 Jun 2018 07:56 - 09 Jun 2018 08:08 #112060 by dinkata
Replied by dinkata on topic DFX Beta..
Last edit: 09 Jun 2018 08:08 by dinkata.
More
09 Jun 2018 14:20 #112069 by Sparky961
Replied by Sparky961 on topic DFX Beta..
This is more observation than speculation, but to put it succinctly the DXF file format is a hopelessly outdated historic relic. To make matters worse it unfortunately remains the defacto standard for 2D profile data exchange in many industries.

I'm also willing to bet that for every file you can make that works with an importer, I can match it with one that doesn't. Maybe this is a bold exaggeration, but it makes my point.
More
10 Jun 2018 01:57 #112114 by smgvbest
Replied by smgvbest on topic DFX Beta..
Why do you consider it outdated if I may ask?
This is all imho but I see that it does the job it was designed for and is widely accepted that doesn't make it a relic. I wouldn't blame the specification for file importers that don't work, I'd blame the programmers who pick and chose how to follow that specification. That doesn't imply the specification is outdated or at fault though. again , imho
Moderators: cncbasher
Time to create page: 0.104 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum