- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 1
Dimensions Slightly Off
- sandersjrs
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
2 years 3 months ago #305500
by sandersjrs
Replied by sandersjrs on topic Dimensions Slightly Off
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sandersjrs
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 1
2 years 3 months ago #305502
by sandersjrs
Replied by sandersjrs on topic Dimensions Slightly Off
-same issues happen on 1/4 and 1/8 - I can hear the steps skipping
-not sure what you mean by your second point
-lower acceleration seems to not change anything
machine images attached
A couple other things to note:
-I'm getting the same problem when I use HSM (solidworks cam add in from autodesk, similar to fusion cam) and Cut2D from Vetric
-If I orient the long direction in the X axis or the Y axis, it seems to skip more steps moving in the positive direction (X or Y). The most positive side of the pocket will have that stepping problem between cutting layers as shown before, but the most negative side of the pocket seems to stay lined up
-not sure what you mean by your second point
-lower acceleration seems to not change anything
machine images attached
A couple other things to note:
-I'm getting the same problem when I use HSM (solidworks cam add in from autodesk, similar to fusion cam) and Cut2D from Vetric
-If I orient the long direction in the X axis or the Y axis, it seems to skip more steps moving in the positive direction (X or Y). The most positive side of the pocket will have that stepping problem between cutting layers as shown before, but the most negative side of the pocket seems to stay lined up
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 18115
- Thank you received: 5334
2 years 3 months ago #305504
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Dimensions Slightly Off
As a test, can you try setting the maximum velocity to
say 1/2 of the current values to see if that stops the step
loss?
say 1/2 of the current values to see if that stops the step
loss?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sandersjrs
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 1
2 years 3 months ago #305505
by sandersjrs
Replied by sandersjrs on topic Dimensions Slightly Off
I couldn't find much on reset mode in the LinuxCNC documentation - could you explain what you mean? I am using LinuxCNC 2.5 - I didn't install it, but maybe a newer version would work better?
I noted this in another reply, but it follows the longways direction no matter which axis it's oriented towards. Is it having trouble with long travel? I also noted that it seems to have trouble only while moving in the positive direction.
Another thing to mention is that when I home the machine and manually jog it to each limit, it reaches each limit spot-on (no collisions) with seemingly no skipping.
I noted this in another reply, but it follows the longways direction no matter which axis it's oriented towards. Is it having trouble with long travel? I also noted that it seems to have trouble only while moving in the positive direction.
Another thing to mention is that when I home the machine and manually jog it to each limit, it reaches each limit spot-on (no collisions) with seemingly no skipping.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Cant do this anymore bye all
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1200
- Thank you received: 426
2 years 3 months ago #305506
by Cant do this anymore bye all
Replied by Cant do this anymore bye all on topic Dimensions Slightly Off
That X axis seems to be a terrible design, from what I can see.
Is there any chance that you can show a picture of each end of the x axis ?
Generally at the driven end of the X axis it's good to see some some of lateral constraint (fixed bearing) and a floating one at the other end.
Is there any chance that you can show a picture of each end of the x axis ?
Generally at the driven end of the X axis it's good to see some some of lateral constraint (fixed bearing) and a floating one at the other end.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sandersjrs
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 1
2 years 3 months ago - 2 years 3 months ago #305512
by sandersjrs
Replied by sandersjrs on topic Dimensions Slightly Off
700 mm/min vs 350 mm/min:
Definitely an improvement...does that point to a specific problem? Currently running it in the opposite direction to see if it's better in that orientation too.
You can see where it skips at 700 mm/min, both in the picture above and this picture:
Like I noted above, it seems to move just fine when manually jogging (at 3000 mm/min) without skipping. It really only skips when running gcode.
Definitely an improvement...does that point to a specific problem? Currently running it in the opposite direction to see if it's better in that orientation too.
You can see where it skips at 700 mm/min, both in the picture above and this picture:
Like I noted above, it seems to move just fine when manually jogging (at 3000 mm/min) without skipping. It really only skips when running gcode.
Last edit: 2 years 3 months ago by sandersjrs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.746 seconds