RockPro64
- andypugh
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 23244
- Thank you received: 4915
26 Feb 2019 22:16 #127203
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic RockPro64
In theory you can resolve the conflicts manually, but it is a lot of work especially in code that you don't necessarily understand.
Is there anything useful in this thread?
forum.armbian.com/topic/7301-booting-a-r...mments#comment-55457
(I just did a google search)
Is there anything useful in this thread?
forum.armbian.com/topic/7301-booting-a-r...mments#comment-55457
(I just did a google search)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blazini36
- Away
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 966
- Thank you received: 163
27 Feb 2019 01:16 #127219
by blazini36
Replied by blazini36 on topic RockPro64
I saw this previously but I did not post it because I wasn't 100% sure that this is what it looks like it is. Rockchip has an "rt" development branch. I can't tell if this is a real-time patched kernel, preempt or otherwise.
Pine generally seems to use Ayufun kernels so the Rockchip kernel is likely missing some board specific changes.
github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/tree/develop-4.4-rt176
Pine generally seems to use Ayufun kernels so the Rockchip kernel is likely missing some board specific changes.
github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/tree/develop-4.4-rt176
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vre
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 618
- Thank you received: 17
08 May 2019 08:25 - 08 May 2019 21:06 #133115
by vre
Replied by vre on topic RockPro64
This repo has realtime 4.4.167 kernel for 3399 soc
github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/tree/develop-4.4-rt
i have not tested yet but seems ok.
github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/tree/develop-4.4-rt
i have not tested yet but seems ok.
Last edit: 08 May 2019 21:06 by vre.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kostas
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 111
- Thank you received: 6
23 Jul 2019 10:04 #140283
by kostas
Replied by kostas on topic RockPro64
Did you have any luck with these boards?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vre
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 618
- Thank you received: 17
29 Jul 2019 13:57 #140886
by vre
Replied by vre on topic RockPro64
No.
rt kernel with default .config does not work .
rt kernel with default .config does not work .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blazini36
- Away
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 966
- Thank you received: 163
29 Jul 2019 14:23 #140887
by blazini36
Replied by blazini36 on topic RockPro64
What kernel did you use? One from the rockchip repo? Did everything on the rock pro work right with this kernel?
Getting linuxcnc to work with it shouldn’t be that big of a deal, it’s getting an RT kernel to work on the board if the board manufacturer didn’t supply it that can be a problem.
Getting linuxcnc to work with it shouldn’t be that big of a deal, it’s getting an RT kernel to work on the board if the board manufacturer didn’t supply it that can be a problem.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vre
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 618
- Thank you received: 17
30 Jul 2019 06:14 - 30 Jul 2019 06:16 #140940
by vre
Replied by vre on topic RockPro64
stock kernel 5.2 for rockpro64 has been released
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/...x-rockchip.git/refs/
also real time patches
cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/...x-rockchip.git/refs/
also real time patches
cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/
Last edit: 30 Jul 2019 06:16 by vre.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- acondit
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 107
- Thank you received: 2
02 Sep 2019 22:48 #143963
by acondit
Replied by acondit on topic RockPro64
I built the linux-stable-rt-4.19.31-rt18 kernel and installed it.
I downloaded the cyclictest suite and ran it several times. The average latency is 3 microseconds. Running it via ssh the max was 45 or 48 until I logged from a wireless keyboard and the HDMI video. I started X and LXQT during that startup, the max went to 58.
I just started it again with the -h option to produce a histogram, now the max is 62 and the average is 4.
Alan
I downloaded the cyclictest suite and ran it several times. The average latency is 3 microseconds. Running it via ssh the max was 45 or 48 until I logged from a wireless keyboard and the HDMI video. I started X and LXQT during that startup, the max went to 58.
I just started it again with the -h option to produce a histogram, now the max is 62 and the average is 4.
Alan
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bellcopter
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
05 Sep 2019 18:18 #144257
by bellcopter
Replied by bellcopter on topic RockPro64
What distro did you use for your build? Those are some great looking latency tests. I'm looking to put a Mesa PCIE card into the Rockpro64 slot and make it a full-fledged controller, so this is very promising.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pl7i92
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1872
- Thank you received: 357
05 Sep 2019 18:33 #144259
by pl7i92
Replied by pl7i92 on topic RockPro64
with the fpga card or a eth you do not need latency at all
it is internal hardware steps that are generated
no software timing involved
it is internal hardware steps that are generated
no software timing involved
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.349 seconds