Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
- rodw
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 10737
- Thank you received: 3540
28 May 2019 21:34 #135200
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
When you say you ran the machine it was a real machine, not a sim? Sims often trigger a latency fault for me but never on the real hardware.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bally123
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 48
- Thank you received: 5
28 May 2019 22:08 #135207
by bally123
Replied by bally123 on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Yep on a real machine - (cutting metal... )
I was surprised to see the error as everyone seemed confident in my numbers, so I restarted the session and continued to work for a while and it didn't reoccur, but I'm sure it would have reoccurred sooner or later...
Hopefully the SMI fix did the trick....
I was surprised to see the error as everyone seemed confident in my numbers, so I restarted the session and continued to work for a while and it didn't reoccur, but I'm sure it would have reoccurred sooner or later...
Hopefully the SMI fix did the trick....
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mike_Eitel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bally123
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 48
- Thank you received: 5
04 Jun 2019 17:17 #135847
by bally123
Replied by bally123 on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Ok after several days the performance is good. I have seen one more occurance of the real time error, it's occurred before I start maching and seems to have no impact on machine performance. Latency numbers still well within requirement for mesa card.
Might try a graphics card at some point but for now I'm just going to roll with it until I get my back up pc built
Might try a graphics card at some point but for now I'm just going to roll with it until I get my back up pc built
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19407
- Thank you received: 6507
22 Nov 2022 02:14 #257287
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Spammer booted, he came back and added links.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NTULINUX
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 74
- Thank you received: 71
22 Nov 2022 04:36 - 22 Nov 2022 04:59 #257299
by NTULINUX
Replied by NTULINUX on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Just FYI,
I also have this repo:
github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer
Disables SMI on Intel chipsets using standalone module, ported from RTAI:
github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer
Default value passed is 0x1 but can be controlled via ./setsmi hal_smi_masked_bits=<variable here> (no <>
Script:
github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer/blob/master/setsmi
I also have 5.4 RTAI kernel debs for Bullseye here:
github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/releases/tag/v5.3.3-delta
Some boards preform better with PREEMPT_RT, others have lower latency with RTAI.
In either case, please refer to this document for a list of problematic BIOS settings:
github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/blob/for-next/README.BIOS
Using this PREEMPT_RT kernel config btw, I had latency under 1 microsecond (yes, one) with my NIC disabled in BIOS, no background tasks:
github.com/NTULINUX/gentoo_backup/blob/m...fig-6.0.0-rc1-rt2-RT
Will only boot as-is on AMD platforms with AHCI or NVMe block devices (XFS and EXT4) Does not support SystemD either (i.e. will not work with Debian)
I also have this repo:
github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer
Disables SMI on Intel chipsets using standalone module, ported from RTAI:
github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer
Default value passed is 0x1 but can be controlled via ./setsmi hal_smi_masked_bits=<variable here> (no <>
Script:
github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer/blob/master/setsmi
I also have 5.4 RTAI kernel debs for Bullseye here:
github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/releases/tag/v5.3.3-delta
Some boards preform better with PREEMPT_RT, others have lower latency with RTAI.
In either case, please refer to this document for a list of problematic BIOS settings:
github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/blob/for-next/README.BIOS
Using this PREEMPT_RT kernel config btw, I had latency under 1 microsecond (yes, one) with my NIC disabled in BIOS, no background tasks:
github.com/NTULINUX/gentoo_backup/blob/m...fig-6.0.0-rc1-rt2-RT
Will only boot as-is on AMD platforms with AHCI or NVMe block devices (XFS and EXT4) Does not support SystemD either (i.e. will not work with Debian)
Last edit: 22 Nov 2022 04:59 by NTULINUX. Reason: Provided heavily tuned PREEMPT_RT kernel config
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.063 seconds