Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results

More
28 May 2019 21:34 #135200 by rodw
When you say you ran the machine it was a real machine, not a sim? Sims often trigger a latency fault for me but never on the real hardware.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bally123
  • bally123's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
28 May 2019 22:08 #135207 by bally123
Replied by bally123 on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Yep on a real machine - (cutting metal...;) )

I was surprised to see the error as everyone seemed confident in my numbers, so I restarted the session and continued to work for a while and it didn't reoccur, but I'm sure it would have reoccurred sooner or later...

Hopefully the SMI fix did the trick....
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mike_Eitel

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bally123
  • bally123's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
04 Jun 2019 17:17 #135847 by bally123
Replied by bally123 on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Ok after several days the performance is good. I have seen one more occurance of the real time error, it's occurred before I start maching and seems to have no impact on machine performance. Latency numbers still well within requirement for mesa card.

Might try a graphics card at some point but for now I'm just going to roll with it until I get my back up pc built

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tommylight
  • tommylight's Avatar
  • Away
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
22 Nov 2022 02:14 #257287 by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Spammer booted, he came back and added links.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Nov 2022 04:36 - 22 Nov 2022 04:59 #257299 by NTULINUX
Replied by NTULINUX on topic Appreciate some Thoughts on latency results
Just FYI,

I also have this repo:

github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer

Disables SMI on Intel chipsets using standalone module, ported from RTAI:

github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer

Default value passed is 0x1 but can be controlled via ./setsmi hal_smi_masked_bits=<variable here> (no <>;)

Script:

github.com/NTULINUX/smi-killer/blob/master/setsmi

I also have 5.4 RTAI kernel debs for Bullseye here:

github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/releases/tag/v5.3.3-delta

Some boards preform better with PREEMPT_RT, others have lower latency with RTAI.

In either case, please refer to this document for a list of problematic BIOS settings:

github.com/NTULINUX/RTAI/blob/for-next/README.BIOS

Using this PREEMPT_RT kernel config btw, I had latency under 1 microsecond (yes, one) with my NIC disabled in BIOS, no background tasks:

github.com/NTULINUX/gentoo_backup/blob/m...fig-6.0.0-rc1-rt2-RT

Will only boot as-is on AMD platforms with AHCI or NVMe block devices (XFS and EXT4) Does not support SystemD either (i.e. will not work with Debian)
Last edit: 22 Nov 2022 04:59 by NTULINUX. Reason: Provided heavily tuned PREEMPT_RT kernel config
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.063 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum