Changing Z-Height While Maintaining Y Velocity

More
08 Aug 2017 16:44 #97185 by PlasmaRemoval
I would like to perform multiple moves in the Z axis while maintaining a constant velocity along the Y axis. For example, I would like to be able to execute something similar to:
G1 X1 Y1 Z1
G1 Y3 Z1
G1 Y5 Z2

...without decelerating and then accelerating again in the Y direction.

Is this possible? I am using a Shopbot PRSalpha Buddy with a Mesa 7i76 board and LinuxCNC. I have tried using G64, but still get more acceleration along Y than I would like.

Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Aug 2017 17:16 #97192 by andypugh
Is the application plasma torch height adjustment?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Aug 2017 17:55 #97196 by PlasmaRemoval
Yes, although it's a nonstandard torch for which the typical voltage-based adjustments will not work. We plan to probe the surface to measure height changes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Aug 2017 19:22 #97199 by andypugh
In that case, you could investigate "probekins"

wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ProbeKins

Your problem sounds identical.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PlasmaRemoval

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Aug 2017 19:50 #97200 by PlasmaRemoval
That module does sound interesting. Do you know where I can find the original source code? The Gitweb link in the wiki is dead. I found an old compiled version on the forum, but I would prefer the source if possible.

Is there no simple G code means to avoid acceleration along one axis between commands affecting a different axis? The module seems like overkill for handling this, but maybe there is no simple solution.

Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Aug 2017 20:06 #97201 by andypugh
The advantage of that module is that it doesn't require special G-code, any 2D plasma CAM software will work.

As for the second question, I don't know. I have never needed to worry about the trajectory planner with my slow old machines

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Aug 2017 02:16 #97226 by jmelson
As long as you are not set for exact stop mode, your code should give smooth motion in Y. You may have to experiment with the P and Q parameters of the G64 command to get the results you want.
See linuxcnc.org/docs/html/gcode/g-code.html#gcode:g61-g61.1
for more info.

Jon

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.141 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum