G41-G42 cuestions !!!
- RobotMatic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 185
- Thank you received: 21
28 Jan 2018 15:17 - 28 Jan 2018 15:17 #105105
by RobotMatic
G41-G42 cuestions !!! was created by RobotMatic
Why Linuxcnc can not generate compensated trajectories G41-G42 without having to add tangent displacements so as not to lose sectors of the trajectory at the entrance ?
Last edit: 28 Jan 2018 15:17 by RobotMatic.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
28 Jan 2018 17:53 #105107
by jmelson
Replied by jmelson on topic G41-G42 cuestions !!!
Because it has strict rules to avoid gouges on the inside corner between linear moves. So, you need to program the lead-in point so it makes an outside corner on the first move after beginning the compensated path. (Yes, this can cause a DIFFERENT kind of gouge, so the lead-in point needs to be about one tool radius away from a line extended out from the surface as it will be cut.
This is described in the docs:
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.6/html/gcode/tool_compensation.html
Look at section 3.
It DID take me a while to learn how to do this reliably.
Jon
This is described in the docs:
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.6/html/gcode/tool_compensation.html
Look at section 3.
It DID take me a while to learn how to do this reliably.
Jon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RobotMatic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 185
- Thank you received: 21
28 Jan 2018 22:18 #105122
by RobotMatic
Replied by RobotMatic on topic G41-G42 cuestions !!!
Why Linuxcnc can not calculate an entry point correct ?
Why the programmer has to solve it ?
It is planned in the future to give this capability to Linuxcnc ?
Thank you very much for your reply!!!
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.6/html/gcode/tool_compensation.html
I have read it many times and I can never understand why the developers took this concept as correct.
linuxcnc is very good, I use it to adjust 2 pieces, and it is very hard for how g41 and g42 work. It should be simpler
fanuc, fagor, siemens, heidenhan , work more easy.
thank!!!
Why the programmer has to solve it ?
It is planned in the future to give this capability to Linuxcnc ?
Thank you very much for your reply!!!
linuxcnc.org/docs/2.6/html/gcode/tool_compensation.html
I have read it many times and I can never understand why the developers took this concept as correct.
linuxcnc is very good, I use it to adjust 2 pieces, and it is very hard for how g41 and g42 work. It should be simpler
fanuc, fagor, siemens, heidenhan , work more easy.
thank!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.068 seconds