- Posts: 54
- Thank you received: 4
G71 in LinuxCNC 2.9
- Barry
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
5 years 8 months ago #198332
by Barry
Replied by Barry on topic G71 in LinuxCNC 2.9
In experimenting with the G71 code LinuxCNC 2.9 I found an issue very similar to one that I found in the G71 remap. If during the G71 cycle the Stop Button in Axis is pressed and then you try to restart or refresh the program, the following error message pops up and it will not go away without restarting Axis...
G7X error: Not monotonic.
However, if during the G71 cycle the E-stop Button in Axis is pressed and then you try to restart or refresh the program, the G71 program restarts without any issues.
Can this be listed as a bug somewhere on a wish list to resolve?
Thank you,
Barry
G7X error: Not monotonic.
However, if during the G71 cycle the E-stop Button in Axis is pressed and then you try to restart or refresh the program, the G71 program restarts without any issues.
Can this be listed as a bug somewhere on a wish list to resolve?
Thank you,
Barry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 19899
- Thank you received: 4655
5 years 8 months ago #198335
by andypugh
Yes, you can add it to the issues list here:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues
Replied by andypugh on topic G71 in LinuxCNC 2.9
Barry wrote: Can this be listed as a bug somewhere on a wish list to resolve?
Yes, you can add it to the issues list here:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues
The following user(s) said Thank You: Barry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Barry
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 54
- Thank you received: 4
5 years 8 months ago #198344
by Barry
Replied by Barry on topic G71 in LinuxCNC 2.9
Thank you. I added the Stop Button issue to the LinuxCNC issues list along with the Stepconf ParPort limited selection issue as well.
Thank you again,
Have a nice day,
Barry
Thank you again,
Have a nice day,
Barry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MRx
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 54
- Thank you received: 9
5 years 4 months ago #212017
by MRx
Replied by MRx on topic G71 in LinuxCNC 2.9
I just tried the G71 command, and I'm missing an important feature compared with a HAAS controller
U and W
U .. Amout left on for finishing in X
W .. Amount left on for finishing Z
From the documentation:
G71 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G71.1 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G71.2 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G72 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G72.1 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G72.2 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
now I'd like to make a small part with the parting tool only, but leaving some parts on the Z axis eliminates the advantage of G71 / G70 when the parting tool is installed.
>> When in absolute mode the U (for X) and W (for Z) can be used as
>> incremental displacements.
this I don't really understand, because there's no U/W in the command interface?
U and W
U .. Amout left on for finishing in X
W .. Amount left on for finishing Z
From the documentation:
G71 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G71.1 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G71.2 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G72 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G72.1 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
G72.2 Q- <X-> <Z-> <D-> <I-> <R->
now I'd like to make a small part with the parting tool only, but leaving some parts on the Z axis eliminates the advantage of G71 / G70 when the parting tool is installed.
>> When in absolute mode the U (for X) and W (for Z) can be used as
>> incremental displacements.
this I don't really understand, because there's no U/W in the command interface?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 19899
- Thank you received: 4655
5 years 4 months ago #212156
by andypugh
I am not sure that I understand what it is that you don't understand, but the parsing of the G71 block is done by a different "interpreter' to normal, and a few command letters have very different meanings (specifically A, C, U W, do not refer to axis movement inside a G71 block, or at least not _those_ axes)
Replied by andypugh on topic G71 in LinuxCNC 2.9
MRx wrote: >> When in absolute mode the U (for X) and W (for Z) can be used as
>> incremental displacements.
this I don't really understand, because there's no U/W in the command interface?
I am not sure that I understand what it is that you don't understand, but the parsing of the G71 block is done by a different "interpreter' to normal, and a few command letters have very different meanings (specifically A, C, U W, do not refer to axis movement inside a G71 block, or at least not _those_ axes)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.317 seconds