Radius Feed Compensation for Milling
19 Jul 2022 12:30 #247762
by moh
Radius Feed Compensation for Milling was created by moh
Hi,
does LinuxCNC have anything built-in for dynamically adjusting the feedrate based on tool diameter and radius of motion, in order to achive a constant surface cutting speed?
Much like Tool Cutter Compensation adjusts the position based on tool and motion radius, but instead i need it to adjust tool feed to achieve constant surface speed, e.g, slow down during internal circular motions, and speed up during external circular motions.
I'm using Fusion360 for CAM, which doesn't seem to allow for automatic feed adjusting based on tool diameter and motion/surface curvature.
Or did anyone try to implement such a feature in a separate project?
I believe the function is also called:
Arc contour adjusted feedrate
Radius adjusted feedrate
does LinuxCNC have anything built-in for dynamically adjusting the feedrate based on tool diameter and radius of motion, in order to achive a constant surface cutting speed?
Much like Tool Cutter Compensation adjusts the position based on tool and motion radius, but instead i need it to adjust tool feed to achieve constant surface speed, e.g, slow down during internal circular motions, and speed up during external circular motions.
I'm using Fusion360 for CAM, which doesn't seem to allow for automatic feed adjusting based on tool diameter and motion/surface curvature.
Or did anyone try to implement such a feature in a separate project?
I believe the function is also called:
Arc contour adjusted feedrate
Radius adjusted feedrate
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Jul 2022 13:04 #247764
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Radius Feed Compensation for Milling
I don't know if it is even possible. How does the controller know whether the cutter is engaging the internal or external curve?
(it might be possible using G41 G42 mode,but that means only if using cutter comp)
How much difference does it make? Without doing the arithmetic my feeling is that feed speed is so much less than surface speed that the difference is negligible.
(it might be possible using G41 G42 mode,but that means only if using cutter comp)
How much difference does it make? Without doing the arithmetic my feeling is that feed speed is so much less than surface speed that the difference is negligible.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 150
19 Jul 2022 15:04 #247770
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic Radius Feed Compensation for Milling
I run into this surprisingly a lot - milling a hole to size.. Say you have a 1 inch hole that you are milling with a 3/4" cutter. You calculate the cutting rate for a 3/4 inch mill for say .001 per tooth. The actual diameter that the cutter is moving around is .25" at say 5ipm. So - the circle takes .15 minutes to do the .25 circle at 5ipm. The 1 inch circle (actual cutting diameter) is doing it in the same time (3.1415 inches) so that calculates out to 20ipm.
(assuming I did the math right)
I normally don't calculate it - I just know to slow it down
sam
(assuming I did the math right)
I normally don't calculate it - I just know to slow it down
sam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Jul 2022 16:46 #247776
by fc60
Replied by fc60 on topic Radius Feed Compensation for Milling
Greetings,
This brings back memories of my programming days at airplane factory. Within Catia there was an option to reduce the feedrate along user selected features.
Look around Fusion360 to see if there is a similar function.
Cheers,
Dave
This brings back memories of my programming days at airplane factory. Within Catia there was an option to reduce the feedrate along user selected features.
Look around Fusion360 to see if there is a similar function.
Cheers,
Dave
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19304
- Thank you received: 6463
19 Jul 2022 17:02 #247777
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Radius Feed Compensation for Milling
Several videos on youtube mentioned this same issue with Fusion360, to long since i watched them so not sure exacty who mentioned it.
Try This Old Tony on youtube.
Try This Old Tony on youtube.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Jul 2022 08:50 #247824
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Radius Feed Compensation for Milling
I think that I was confused by the phrase "surface cutting speed" and thought this was a spindle speed / SFM question.
(Which probably is a negligible effect, SFM = RPM X Radius +/- feedrate )
Compensating the feed rate to maintain constant feed-per-tooth is more of a real issue, and is probably most easily handled in the CAM, if the CAM can do it.
I think that this might be challengine to do in HAL, I don't think that all the info is there. We have had attempts to calculate the arc radius, so that might be possible, but knowing which side the cutter is engaged on is more difficult.
Potentially this could be handled by code in the trajectory planner, but even then probably only if G41 / G42 are in effect.
But it is not included in the current code.
(Which probably is a negligible effect, SFM = RPM X Radius +/- feedrate )
Compensating the feed rate to maintain constant feed-per-tooth is more of a real issue, and is probably most easily handled in the CAM, if the CAM can do it.
I think that this might be challengine to do in HAL, I don't think that all the info is there. We have had attempts to calculate the arc radius, so that might be possible, but knowing which side the cutter is engaged on is more difficult.
Potentially this could be handled by code in the trajectory planner, but even then probably only if G41 / G42 are in effect.
But it is not included in the current code.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.071 seconds