Clocking the Actual Machining duaration
26 Nov 2010 13:43 #5630
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Clocking the Actual Machining duaration
I think you need to sum them up, as otherwise you will get rounding errors.
Stored in a static long long (64 bits) you would wrap round in 14,000 years. That should be long enough
Alternatively the comp code can access the rtapi_get_time and rtapi_get_clocks functions, but as these also use long longs there is not much to be gained.
git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=emc2.git;a=blo...282c53f877fc;hb=HEAD
(lines 300 onwards)
Stored in a static long long (64 bits) you would wrap round in 14,000 years. That should be long enough
Alternatively the comp code can access the rtapi_get_time and rtapi_get_clocks functions, but as these also use long longs there is not much to be gained.
git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=emc2.git;a=blo...282c53f877fc;hb=HEAD
(lines 300 onwards)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Nov 2010 17:25 #5642
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Re:Clocking the Actual Machining duaration
BTDTGTTS
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.085 seconds