Steppers and control signals
- windoze killa
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
17 Jun 2014 16:32 #48028
by windoze killa
Steppers and control signals was created by windoze killa
I have been looking on the net for information on steppers and how to control them. The steppers I have are 5 wire unipolar, 12V, 320ma/phase. I have seen a few different controllers that supply different types if signals. I have having trouble finding information of the differences. Hopefully one of your learned fellows can explain the difference between the following.
1000
0100
0010
0001
and
1010
0110
0101
1001
Any help much appreciated.
Jason
1000
0100
0010
0001
and
1010
0110
0101
1001
Any help much appreciated.
Jason
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BigJohnT
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 7330
- Thank you received: 1177
17 Jun 2014 18:58 #48031
by BigJohnT
Replied by BigJohnT on topic Steppers and control signals
The LinuxCNC stepgen can do 15 different step types.
linuxcnc.org/docs/html/hal/rtcomps.html#sec:Stepgen
JT
linuxcnc.org/docs/html/hal/rtcomps.html#sec:Stepgen
JT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- windoze killa
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
18 Jun 2014 15:35 #48053
by windoze killa
Replied by windoze killa on topic Steppers and control signals
Thank you. Now I am even more confused. None of that explained the difference between the 2 I asked about.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ArcEye
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 25
- Thank you received: 761
18 Jun 2014 15:59 #48055
by ArcEye
You haven't said what these are or where you got them
AFAIK, you can simply use 5 or 6 wire unipolar steppers as bipolar by just ignoring the wire(s) that go to the central tap on the coils.
Then they can be run from a standard bipolar driver with stepgen type 0
regards
Replied by ArcEye on topic Steppers and control signals
1000
0100
0010
0001
and
1010
0110
0101
1001
You haven't said what these are or where you got them
AFAIK, you can simply use 5 or 6 wire unipolar steppers as bipolar by just ignoring the wire(s) that go to the central tap on the coils.
Then they can be run from a standard bipolar driver with stepgen type 0
regards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- windoze killa
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
18 Jun 2014 16:49 #48057
by windoze killa
I got these from various sites that have stepper drivers. I am trying to build my own drivers (I am an electronics technician) I was just hoping that some one could tell me the difference between the 2 stepping sequences and what the benefit of each would be.
Replied by windoze killa on topic Steppers and control signals
1000
0100
0010
0001
and
1010
0110
0101
1001
You haven't said what these are or where you got them
AFAIK, you can simply use 5 or 6 wire unipolar steppers as bipolar by just ignoring the wire(s) that go to the central tap on the coils.
Then they can be run from a standard bipolar driver with stepgen type 0
regards
I got these from various sites that have stepper drivers. I am trying to build my own drivers (I am an electronics technician) I was just hoping that some one could tell me the difference between the 2 stepping sequences and what the benefit of each would be.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23559
- Thank you received: 4858
19 Jun 2014 06:20 #48095
by andypugh
The first variant energises one coil at a time. The second energises two. The second should have better torque as there is no risk of zero excitation at any point in the sequence.
But... I don't think the second one is right. I think it should be
1010
0110
0101
0011
1010
1001
0101
1100
Which is a half-stepping 2-coil sequence.
if you are building your own driver then just let LinuxCNC do the heavy lifting. It can output arbitrary patterns (in table mode) so you can experiment for free. Don't put your assumptions in hardware
Replied by andypugh on topic Steppers and control signals
1000
0100
0010
0001
and
1010
0110
0101
1001
The first variant energises one coil at a time. The second energises two. The second should have better torque as there is no risk of zero excitation at any point in the sequence.
But... I don't think the second one is right. I think it should be
1010
0110
0101
0011
1010
1001
0101
1100
Which is a half-stepping 2-coil sequence.
if you are building your own driver then just let LinuxCNC do the heavy lifting. It can output arbitrary patterns (in table mode) so you can experiment for free. Don't put your assumptions in hardware
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: PCW, jmelson
Time to create page: 0.061 seconds