Robotarm controll via RAMPS Ardunio
- RoboFan
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
20 Nov 2017 12:36 #102055
by RoboFan
Robotarm controll via RAMPS Ardunio was created by RoboFan
Hello I installed Linux CNC yesterday after searched for CNC controlling software via linux. I am actually building an open source Robot Arm www.bcn3dtechnologies.com/en/bcn3d-moveo...-future-of-learning/ The basis of the control hardware is 3d printer technic: Arduino Mega 2560 an a Ramps 1.4 Stepper driver board. I searched the forum for Ramps using but didn`t find anything (I am curious about that).
Is it possible to control an Arduino with Ramps 1.4 board via Linux CNC?
Is it possible to control an Arduino with Ramps 1.4 board via Linux CNC?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 10739
- Thank you received: 3543
20 Nov 2017 13:28 #102058
by rodw
In a word no.
LinuxCNC is a motion controller and your Arduino is one too.
Whilst it might be possible to get 2 systems talking to each other, it will be more trouble than its worth.
With Linuxcnc, either use a parallel port board or some of the third party boards such as those from Mesa or Pico Systems. These have more inputs and step generators than a parallel port which might be more appropriate for a robot arm. Eg, I use a Mesa 7i76e ethernet board with 5 stepgens, 32 inputs and 16 outputs plus 2 MPG inputs and a spindle controller before I count all of the daughter cards that could be added to it.
Replied by rodw on topic Robotarm controll via RAMPS Ardunio
Is it possible to control an Arduino with Ramps 1.4 board via Linux CNC?
In a word no.
LinuxCNC is a motion controller and your Arduino is one too.
Whilst it might be possible to get 2 systems talking to each other, it will be more trouble than its worth.
With Linuxcnc, either use a parallel port board or some of the third party boards such as those from Mesa or Pico Systems. These have more inputs and step generators than a parallel port which might be more appropriate for a robot arm. Eg, I use a Mesa 7i76e ethernet board with 5 stepgens, 32 inputs and 16 outputs plus 2 MPG inputs and a spindle controller before I count all of the daughter cards that could be added to it.
The following user(s) said Thank You: RoboFan
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RoboFan
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
20 Nov 2017 15:47 #102062
by RoboFan
Replied by RoboFan on topic Robotarm controll via RAMPS Ardunio
Thank you for the quick info. I should have a closer look on this things to understand the differences. So the next Step could be to change the little arduino with bigger boards.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23563
- Thank you received: 4859
24 Nov 2017 17:36 #102299
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Robotarm controll via RAMPS Ardunio
How do you control the arm with the Arduino normally? Does the Arduino controller handle the robot kinematics?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bjames28
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 77
- Thank you received: 0
25 Nov 2017 19:01 #102340
by bjames28
Replied by bjames28 on topic Robotarm controll via RAMPS Ardunio
Hi,
Look at this page: Moveo kinematic
(you need to register in order to access the ini/hal files)
The simulation configuration seems to work with Moveo D-H parameters calculated. I installed the vismach sim config and after some modifications I was able to move the arms.
Hopefully the details are enough to start the parport setup too.
Janos
Look at this page: Moveo kinematic
(you need to register in order to access the ini/hal files)
The simulation configuration seems to work with Moveo D-H parameters calculated. I installed the vismach sim config and after some modifications I was able to move the arms.
Hopefully the details are enough to start the parport setup too.
Janos
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: PCW, jmelson
Time to create page: 0.055 seconds