Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
- hoffb77
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 21
12 Aug 2022 20:51 - 13 Aug 2022 13:16 #249621
by hoffb77
Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter was created by hoffb77
I have a question about the Inductosyn positioning system by Farrand Controls. I know the system is similar to a resolver but I wondered if anyone knew how similar. The analog to digital board they sell now has the ability to convert resolver signals as well as their Inductosyn transducers.
I have a rotary indexer that has one of these systems. It had a "Sense Amplifier" hooked to it but other than that and the name 'Bendix" branded on the board there was no other information(except for the last pot adjustment was noted). The numbers found on the board do not provide any results for me yet.
I was hoping Jon might see this and chime in on his experience with Inductosyn if any. And shed light on whether he thinks his resolver converter might work for me. I have embedded a motor encoder for now but would like to get something back on the rotary itself.
Thanks, Ben
I have a rotary indexer that has one of these systems. It had a "Sense Amplifier" hooked to it but other than that and the name 'Bendix" branded on the board there was no other information(except for the last pot adjustment was noted). The numbers found on the board do not provide any results for me yet.
I was hoping Jon might see this and chime in on his experience with Inductosyn if any. And shed light on whether he thinks his resolver converter might work for me. I have embedded a motor encoder for now but would like to get something back on the rotary itself.
Thanks, Ben
Attachments:
Last edit: 13 Aug 2022 13:16 by hoffb77. Reason: I need to remember names better....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jmelson
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 817
- Thank you received: 157
13 Aug 2022 01:02 #249628
by jmelson
Replied by jmelson on topic Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
I tried to make a version of my resolver converter that would work with linear inductosyns, but could not get it to work. Possibly the 10 KHz excitation of the chip I was using was too high. I also had to drive it with lots of current, so that may have caused a 90 degree phase shift. Anyway, it just didn't work.
Jon
Jon
The following user(s) said Thank You: hoffb77
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Henk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 397
- Thank you received: 85
13 Aug 2022 03:45 #249629
by Henk
Replied by Henk on topic Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
HII have some experience with Farrand inductosyn transducers. I converted a 5 axis Mitsui Seiki machine 2 years ago. It had a dead Fanuc system 9 on it. The fanuc system did the conversion i assume to a digital signal on one of the cards, but i could not figure out that part.In the end i purchased two Farrand 220100 converters on Ebay, read the documents and it worked, but i must say it is not a simple setup.
Your photo above show the pre-amplifier. it amplifies the (very small) analog sin/cos signal before going to the converter board. there should be two of them if you want to use the 220100 converter. I met an experienced guy locally earlier this year who have been doing Fanuc and Siemens retrofits for 40 years, told me that the resolver converters will not work on these because they are "low inductance" I cannot say more about that though, a bit beyond my knowledge base.....
Attached is the manual for the Farrand 220100 i used. Note that you need to buy the connector card as well, not sure what the number is for that, there are some on Ebay, as well as 220100 cards. You also need a very stable 15, 0, -15V power supply for this.The 220100 card provides a 10KHz excitation signal, reads the amplified sin/cos feedback and interpolates them to provide a quad signal with z pulse.
Regards
Henk
Your photo above show the pre-amplifier. it amplifies the (very small) analog sin/cos signal before going to the converter board. there should be two of them if you want to use the 220100 converter. I met an experienced guy locally earlier this year who have been doing Fanuc and Siemens retrofits for 40 years, told me that the resolver converters will not work on these because they are "low inductance" I cannot say more about that though, a bit beyond my knowledge base.....
Attached is the manual for the Farrand 220100 i used. Note that you need to buy the connector card as well, not sure what the number is for that, there are some on Ebay, as well as 220100 cards. You also need a very stable 15, 0, -15V power supply for this.The 220100 card provides a 10KHz excitation signal, reads the amplified sin/cos feedback and interpolates them to provide a quad signal with z pulse.
Regards
Henk
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, hoffb77
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hoffb77
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 21
13 Aug 2022 13:14 #249649
by hoffb77
Replied by hoffb77 on topic Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
Answered my question and got me pointed in the right direction. I couldn't ask for more.
Mr. Elson and Henk, Thank you
Ben
Mr. Elson and Henk, Thank you
Ben
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- scotth
- Away
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 233
- Thank you received: 56
13 Aug 2022 16:26 - 13 Aug 2022 16:29 #249656
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
This one might be worth looking at.
Farrand rotary systems are very accurate and work well. I don't remember how much trouble the slip ring units are, but the transformer coupled units ere bulletproof.
Farrand rotary systems are very accurate and work well. I don't remember how much trouble the slip ring units are, but the transformer coupled units ere bulletproof.
Attachments:
Last edit: 13 Aug 2022 16:29 by scotth.
The following user(s) said Thank You: hoffb77
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- scotth
- Away
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 233
- Thank you received: 56
13 Aug 2022 16:30 #249657
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
I love this editor.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 23297
- Thank you received: 4938
24 Aug 2022 11:51 #250319
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Inductosyn / Resolver? - Pico's Resolver to Quadrature Converter
You could try messing about with an Arduino:
wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ResolverToQuadratureConverter
You might be able to get something out.
If you do, then I wouldn't convert to quadrature, sending numeric values digitally would be likely to work better. (bit-banged SPI for example)
This is possibly a good use for a Raspberry Pi Pico as that has some programmable units for high speed signal processing.
wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ResolverToQuadratureConverter
You might be able to get something out.
If you do, then I wouldn't convert to quadrature, sending numeric values digitally would be likely to work better. (bit-banged SPI for example)
This is possibly a good use for a Raspberry Pi Pico as that has some programmable units for high speed signal processing.
The following user(s) said Thank You: hoffb77
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: PCW, jmelson
Time to create page: 1.074 seconds