H bridge
- juliankoenig87
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 61
- Thank you received: 19
24 Jan 2024 17:41 #291538
by juliankoenig87
Replied by juliankoenig87 on topic H bridge
Also a possibility. Where can you buy it?
I also have some old granitedevices vsd e laying around. Great design up to 160V DC and each are able to drive 2 DC servos. This would be the perfect driver for your application. Unfortunately not buyable these days.
I also have some old granitedevices vsd e laying around. Great design up to 160V DC and each are able to drive 2 DC servos. This would be the perfect driver for your application. Unfortunately not buyable these days.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jan 2024 19:41 #291621
by vre
I don't see any schematic/code for this..
Anyway i will correct the H bridges with increased isolation distance and try it.
(maybe i will add also overcurrent protection)
you can use this.
It is pretty good. All you need to configure your linuxcnc to pwm for each direction and you need to solder 3 wires. Thats it. No need to worry about deadtime or protection features. Without main mcu of this card , you can use just like a hbridge.
I don't see any schematic/code for this..
Anyway i will correct the H bridges with increased isolation distance and try it.
(maybe i will add also overcurrent protection)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jan 2024 22:50 #291631
by vre
I will close loop in linuxcnc so linuxcnc will do all pid control.
Witch closed loop is better in terms of positioning accuracy-accelaration-speed-torque? 100% pid control with linuxcnc or positioning-speed-torque pid by servo drive
and additional positioning pid in linuxcnc ?
Witch closed loop is better in terms of positioning accuracy-accelaration-speed-torque? 100% pid control with linuxcnc or positioning-speed-torque pid by servo drive
and additional positioning pid in linuxcnc ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Jan 2024 03:46 #291641
by blazini36
Can't really answer that but Open loop steppers work fine in LinuxCNC and they generally only have a PID check for the step command, it's not feedback based closed loop. I don't use DC stuff but a MCU running decent a PID in firmware will always be faster than LinuxCNC but I don't really think you need it for an Axis. If you can manage to rework those Hbridges they will be pretty cheap so just try it and see how it works.I will close loop in linuxcnc so linuxcnc will do all pid control.
Witch closed loop is better in terms of positioning accuracy-accelaration-speed-torque? 100% pid control with linuxcnc or positioning-speed-torque pid by servo drive
and additional positioning pid in linuxcnc ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
27 Jan 2024 00:32 #291703
by vre
I see that there are a lot of different adum drivers but i dont know
if exists something better than ADuM4224.
H bridge except from better isolation and better mosfets
needs 1 error output (general fault/overcurrent)
and 1 enable input.
Current sensor like ACS712 or shunt will be better?
if exists something better than ADuM4224.
H bridge except from better isolation and better mosfets
needs 1 error output (general fault/overcurrent)
and 1 enable input.
Current sensor like ACS712 or shunt will be better?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.094 seconds