Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
- remon_v
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 97
- Thank you received: 7
22 May 2022 08:47 - 22 May 2022 08:58 #243535
by remon_v
Replied by remon_v on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
I just did that… and didn’t work.
What did work is when I clicked ‘Tool touch off’
What did work is when I clicked ‘Tool touch off’
Last edit: 22 May 2022 08:58 by remon_v.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23536
- Thank you received: 4852
22 May 2022 09:10 #243537
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
Can you post the first 20 or 30 lines of the G-code?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- remon_v
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 97
- Thank you received: 7
22 May 2022 09:18 - 22 May 2022 09:19 #243539
by remon_v
Replied by remon_v on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
I’m sorry I does work…
I only changed the Z-limit max of the joint and not the axis.
Now I changed both and it works!
Thanks for the help!
I only changed the Z-limit max of the joint and not the axis.
Now I changed both and it works!
Thanks for the help!
Last edit: 22 May 2022 09:19 by remon_v.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- remon_v
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 97
- Thank you received: 7
22 May 2022 16:31 #243563
by remon_v
Replied by remon_v on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23536
- Thank you received: 4852
23 May 2022 22:21 #243647
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
I thought that I answered this.
Fusion has an option to use tool diameter compensation in the CAM or in the controller.
But the tool length is just assumed to be correct, ie Fusion assumes that after a G43 the tool point is at the controlled point.
The tool length data in Fusion is only for the graphics. The tool length data in LinuxCNC is the important one. (and should be set by touch-off or tool-probe, not from measuring the tool)
Fusion has an option to use tool diameter compensation in the CAM or in the controller.
But the tool length is just assumed to be correct, ie Fusion assumes that after a G43 the tool point is at the controlled point.
The tool length data in Fusion is only for the graphics. The tool length data in LinuxCNC is the important one. (and should be set by touch-off or tool-probe, not from measuring the tool)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- OliverLSedlacek
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 17
- Thank you received: 1
07 Feb 2023 09:38 #263905
by OliverLSedlacek
Replied by OliverLSedlacek on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
I don't want this to be a thread hijack, but I'm a newbie and also struggling with Z limits. What's the convention for Z limits, 0 (table) to 100 (fully up) or -100 for table and 0 for fully up?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19369
- Thank you received: 6482
07 Feb 2023 11:07 #263917
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Z-axis coördinates problem after running program
Usually for mills it is 0 up and -100 down to the table, then use G54 offset to set 0 at the top of the workpiece.
The following user(s) said Thank You: OliverLSedlacek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Skullworks
Time to create page: 0.149 seconds