Suggestion regarding the documentation

I said I wouldn't post here anymore but here I am again.
Sorry if the initial post wasn't specific enough. The initial echo wasn't asking for details so I assumed the it was clear what I was referring to.
I also didn't check if the html docs also used those funny characters or if it was only the pdfs, so I assumed they did.

The pdf's have some advantages: Full text search maybe is arguably the most important one, e.g. when researching a topic. The ability to add own notes on text passages and highlighting stuff right in the document is nice to have too.
Also it's what's right there on the real machine in the shop that might not be connected to the internet.

Thanks for the suggestions regarding using the html docs/source/github, but I'm really not looking for help for me personally.
It was just an idea for a seemingly simple improvement...

Thanks for looking into it anyway!

Don't want to stir the pot by opening another thread on docs but it seems worth mentioning:
I just noticed that linuxcnc_documentation.pdf and the online html version seem to be out of sync.
At least the whole section on QtVcp (linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/gui/qtvcp.html) seems to be missing in the pdf.

Currently I often switch between 'traditional book reading' the pdfs on an ebook reader when not sitting in front of the pc and htmls when actively doing stuff. So if I stumble upon other missing stuff I can let you know...

having just started to look at the pdfs (online) instead of the html docs on line, they do look different or have older content in them

I don't know what's being used now but has switching to something like readthedocs.io been considered? It has some features to handle localization. I'm sure it'd be no small undertaking to change.