That was ......well disapointing, the video i mean. It is not doing the only thing it is made for, cutting.
Bare with me for a moment:
All of you have smartphones, install the Physics Toolbox, open it, swipe from left, chose accelerometers, place the phone on the machine somewher that it will not fall while cutting, turn on the machine and check the screen, move all axes and check the screen, now cut something doing light cuts.
The point is, the diference betwen a not cutting machine and a cutting machine is huge, even at light cuts.
The other point is, i am fairly certain that the system i described above with at least 2 or 3 sensors is much more likely to work much much better that the systems described and seen on the web, case in point the video above, at a 20 to 40 $ price tops.
I have never seen those on a production machine ever, i have seen plenty of machines. The only one i have seen was the one i mentioned before, costing 40.000, mounted on a mori costing at least 200.000 and it all failed miserably on the first test, after 2 days of tunning.
I am not blaming the technology or the experts or anything or anyone, it is just that some things do not work beter by complicating them, never ever. I could add this last line to another thread going on in this forum, on another subject that has the same bottom line, namely simple is better.
Sorry for barging in, i will retreat now.