You're right on line 126. My mistake, however still a problem.
Todd -
48 # create a signal for the estop loopback
49 net enable iocontrol.0.user-enable-out iocontrol.0.emc-enable-in
no reference to parport.2.pin-03-out there.
Doing a search in the file shows only one instance of parport.2.pin-03-out since I deleted it on line 126.
Still get same original error:
iocontrol: machine: 'LINUXCNC-1BP' version '2.7.8'
Found file(REL): ./1BPstepper.hal
Found file(REL): ./2X-BoxPinOutTest.hal
./2X-BoxPinOutTest.hal:66: Pin 'iocontrol.0.user-enable-out' was already linked to signal 'enable'
Shutting down and cleaning up LinuxCNC...
So still the question how can it already be linked?
Last edit: 7 years 2 months ago by jensor. Reason: add text.
Did you check all the HAL files?
iocontrol.0.user-enable-out could be connected in another HAL file- it is connected in the main HAL file if the config was generated with stepconf for instance.
The other possibility is you are not running the config/files that you think you are.I have had two versions of a config and edited the wrong one sometimes.
Yes 2 occurrences of iocontrol.0.user-enable-out:
49 net enable iocontrol.0.user-enable-out iocontrol.0.emc-enable-in
66 net estopactivated iocontrol.0.user-enable-out parport.2.pin-03-out
Line 49 shows iocontrol.0.user-enable-out (an output) being connected to
iocontrol.0.emc-enable-in (an input)
Since iocontrol.0.user-enable-out is an output while can't it be connected as an input to the parallel port card?
