Fusion 360 - EMC Post ?

andypugh wrote:

spumco wrote:

Possibly it might help if a paid subscriber made the request?  Just a thought, but I'd be happy to.
As far as Autodesk are concerned I am a paying subscriber (with just short of a million cloud credits, they seem to have conflated my personal account with that of a major car manufacturer) so I doubt that makes any difference. 
 

Sounds like it's time for you to open up a 3rd-party CAM service and start burning through those cloud credits in the manufacturing extension.

"Cheap nesting!, Low-cost continuous 4th axis programs, get 'em while they're hot!"  image missing /media/kunena/emoticons/wink.png

Haha - indeed. IIRC, a credit costs something like $1, so you are not far off being a millionaire. I wish you could transfer some of those to me, although I believe they only have a life of 1 month once you actually apply any of them to their damned "extensions".

I don't think they have any resources formally planned for supporting Fusion lathe CAM within Autodesk. The last "documentation" update I am aware of was actually published as a blog post....

Hello. Didnt want to cook new topic. Here are pictures of Fusion simulations and reality..why would I get so different results? It shouldnt be SO round.
 

Also I had this problem - different radius on different depths.
 

Disable G64 path blending, set a G64 P0.1 for mm or G64 P0.004 for inch.
Oh i see you have it set, so what is the tool diameter ?

It might be worth looking through the generated code to see if it changes the G64 setting at any point.

I did cut these earlier..didnt notice, but it was fine.. now its round. Maybe unticking g64 will fix? Tool diameter 5.8mm