Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9
- rider-83
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 237
- Thank you received: 10
20 Apr 2021 05:40 #206502
by rider-83
Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9 was created by rider-83
I've upgrade to LinuxCNC 2.9 ( & Buster)
I noticed the gmoccapy script is completly differant between version for LinuxCNC 2.7 & 2.9
My 2.7 version of gmoccapy had some alterations which I had implemented, but won't work with the newer version with out studying the new code.
Can I simply copy and use my original file from version 2.7 or does it have to be the newer file?
I noticed the gmoccapy script is completly differant between version for LinuxCNC 2.7 & 2.9
My 2.7 version of gmoccapy had some alterations which I had implemented, but won't work with the newer version with out studying the new code.
Can I simply copy and use my original file from version 2.7 or does it have to be the newer file?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- newbynobi
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2075
- Thank you received: 406
20 Apr 2021 15:56 #206538
by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9
That depends on your config. I.E. The spindle names has changed, as 2.9 does support multiple spindles, some gmoccapy pin names may have changed, etc.
So you need to check from a terminal for error outputs and correct them.
If you piblish your config folder, we may be able to assist.
But why did you update to 2.9 and not to 2.8?
2.9 is an development branch, it might have undesired bugs.
Norbert
So you need to check from a terminal for error outputs and correct them.
If you piblish your config folder, we may be able to assist.
But why did you update to 2.9 and not to 2.8?
2.9 is an development branch, it might have undesired bugs.
Norbert
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rider-83
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 237
- Thank you received: 10
20 Apr 2021 17:23 #206546
by rider-83
Replied by rider-83 on topic Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9
I require the use of the G71 cycle, I posted a question on the forum as to what would be my best and simplest way to achieve this. It was recommended by another forum user that 2.9 would be my best option.
Its turning out to be a pain in the ass as I had the system up and running fine. Just with out G71
Its turning out to be a pain in the ass as I had the system up and running fine. Just with out G71
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rider-83
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 237
- Thank you received: 10
20 Apr 2021 17:25 #206547
by rider-83
Replied by rider-83 on topic Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9
Do you think I should back step to 2.8 to make things simpler for myself?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- newbynobi
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2075
- Thank you received: 406
20 Apr 2021 20:33 - 20 Apr 2021 20:35 #206566
by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9
As mentioned,
2.8 is the actual stable releas
2.9 is the development branch, so bugs are not unusual
New features will be only included in the development branch, 2.8 receives only bug fixes to be stable all time
If you need G71 check if it is also in 2.8, I do not know that, as I use my own cycles for my lathe, I have never played with that.
I am using 2.8 on my machines and 2.9 on my development computer and all my machines have a simulated clone on that computer.
Norbert
2.8 is the actual stable releas
2.9 is the development branch, so bugs are not unusual
New features will be only included in the development branch, 2.8 receives only bug fixes to be stable all time
If you need G71 check if it is also in 2.8, I do not know that, as I use my own cycles for my lathe, I have never played with that.
I am using 2.8 on my machines and 2.9 on my development computer and all my machines have a simulated clone on that computer.
Norbert
Last edit: 20 Apr 2021 20:35 by newbynobi.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 23563
- Thank you received: 4859
21 Apr 2021 21:10 #206705
by andypugh
It isn't.
tbh I think that 2.8 and 2.9 are very similar as far as core code goes, the main difference is in Python versions supported (As I understan it)
Replied by andypugh on topic Ver 2.7 to Ver 2.9
If you need G71 check if it is also in 2.8
It isn't.
tbh I think that 2.8 and 2.9 are very similar as far as core code goes, the main difference is in Python versions supported (As I understan it)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: newbynobi, HansU
Time to create page: 0.055 seconds