- User Interfaces
- Other User Interfaces
- PathPilot
- Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
18 Sep 2019 18:02 #145529
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I'm pretty sure the 7I92 is supported by PP 2.xx, and it will likely write the appropriate
firmware to the 7I92 card, though I am not so sure about differences in Tormach
breakout versions
firmware to the 7I92 card, though I am not so sure about differences in Tormach
breakout versions
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Sep 2019 18:03 #145530
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I was actually suggesting using the parallel port, if that is what the original Mach installation did.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Sep 2019 18:07 #145531
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
In that case, this thread should be helpful:
forum.linuxcnc.org/pathpilot/30222-setti...-pathpilot-version-2
forum.linuxcnc.org/pathpilot/30222-setti...-pathpilot-version-2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Sep 2019 18:18 #145534
by belli
Replied by belli on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I don't think PP was ever designed for parallel port. It started with the 5i25/6i25, hardware step generation is always better...
To set up PP for parallel port is a lot of work and for the cost of a 5i25/6i25/7i92 I just don't think it is worth it. The BOB hasn't really changed in all this time, I have checked the circuit diagrams and the changes are fairly small. The earliest I have is 30162 Rev5 which was basically their first BOB but I don't have the circuit diags for it. Before my time...
To set up PP for parallel port is a lot of work and for the cost of a 5i25/6i25/7i92 I just don't think it is worth it. The BOB hasn't really changed in all this time, I have checked the circuit diagrams and the changes are fairly small. The earliest I have is 30162 Rev5 which was basically their first BOB but I don't have the circuit diags for it. Before my time...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Sep 2019 18:51 #145536
by belli
Replied by belli on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I've had a look at the 'drive with pots on it', there is a single part number: 223-0462 Rev0.
I don't know who made it or what kind of drive it is but has 220/115V 1ph input and a 3ph output(U,V,W). The output stage is GB15B60KD IGBT's arraged in three half bridges. There is no micro that I can see but a 22V10 programmable logic chip.
It has an input for ENable, Direction and a Speed command (0-5V).
Perhaps someone here can shed some light on it.
I don't know who made it or what kind of drive it is but has 220/115V 1ph input and a 3ph output(U,V,W). The output stage is GB15B60KD IGBT's arraged in three half bridges. There is no micro that I can see but a 22V10 programmable logic chip.
It has an input for ENable, Direction and a Speed command (0-5V).
Perhaps someone here can shed some light on it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2019 11:57 #145577
by andypugh
Agreed. But if the original Mach3 was parallel port (And I really have no idea if that was actually the case) then a basic LinuxCNC installation (without PP) is trivial.
Then, with some fluency in LinuxCNC gained, it would be a case of merging the two configs to get PP working on the PP.
Replied by andypugh on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I don't think PP was ever designed for parallel port. It started with the 5i25/6i25, hardware step generation is always better...
Agreed. But if the original Mach3 was parallel port (And I really have no idea if that was actually the case) then a basic LinuxCNC installation (without PP) is trivial.
Then, with some fluency in LinuxCNC gained, it would be a case of merging the two configs to get PP working on the PP.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ilikeapples
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
19 Sep 2019 19:00 #145613
by Ilikeapples
I just checked the bob, it is a 30162 ver 2.0 rev 0
Replied by Ilikeapples on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I don't think PP was ever designed for parallel port. It started with the 5i25/6i25, hardware step generation is always better...
To set up PP for parallel port is a lot of work and for the cost of a 5i25/6i25/7i92 I just don't think it is worth it. The BOB hasn't really changed in all this time, I have checked the circuit diagrams and the changes are fairly small. The earliest I have is 30162 Rev5 which was basically their first BOB but I don't have the circuit diags for it. Before my time...
I just checked the bob, it is a 30162 ver 2.0 rev 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ilikeapples
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
19 Sep 2019 19:01 #145614
by Ilikeapples
The Mach 3 is parallel port
Replied by Ilikeapples on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
I don't think PP was ever designed for parallel port. It started with the 5i25/6i25, hardware step generation is always better...
Agreed. But if the original Mach3 was parallel port (And I really have no idea if that was actually the case) then a basic LinuxCNC installation (without PP) is trivial.
Then, with some fluency in LinuxCNC gained, it would be a case of merging the two configs to get PP working on the PP.
The Mach 3 is parallel port
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Sep 2019 19:07 #145615
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
Is there any sign of a Mach3 XML file? If there is then you could be up and running with LinuxCNC very quickly, as the "stepconf" wizard can import a Mach XML file.
Even if you don't plan to use the parallel port I think that this might be a useful exercise for the time it takes.
Even if you don't plan to use the parallel port I think that this might be a useful exercise for the time it takes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ilikeapples
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
19 Sep 2019 19:09 #145616
by Ilikeapples
Replied by Ilikeapples on topic Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: cncbasher
- User Interfaces
- Other User Interfaces
- PathPilot
- Upgrade to PP 2.xx on Tormach 1100 series 1 from Mach 3
Time to create page: 1.167 seconds