Apparent Step Errors MKII
02 Jun 2021 05:32 #210956
by jnwinkie
Replied by jnwinkie on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Hi Sam;
Table is loosely based on this design, with mods to accommodate the 4:1 reduction as recommended by Tommy.
www.instructables.com/CNC-Plasma-Table/
I tried as you suggested with the motors energized and couldn't budge the X and Y axis. The Z has a bit of deflection in the torch holding plate but I doubt that would be a problem as there is no real load on it when cutting.
Any other lines of thought would be greatly appreciated, as the table seems to work otherwise but I have a need to cut out a number of flanges and getting circles accurate is critical
Thanks
John
Table is loosely based on this design, with mods to accommodate the 4:1 reduction as recommended by Tommy.
www.instructables.com/CNC-Plasma-Table/
I tried as you suggested with the motors energized and couldn't budge the X and Y axis. The Z has a bit of deflection in the torch holding plate but I doubt that would be a problem as there is no real load on it when cutting.
Any other lines of thought would be greatly appreciated, as the table seems to work otherwise but I have a need to cut out a number of flanges and getting circles accurate is critical
Thanks
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6430
02 Jun 2021 09:22 #210981
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
A check for binding should be done.
The following user(s) said Thank You: jnwinkie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Jun 2021 03:20 #211052
by jnwinkie
Replied by jnwinkie on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Thanks Tommy;
With the motors de-energized I can move the gantry with some effort and the Y axis moves OK as well.
Do I need bigger motors? The current ones are 3.1nM 4.2A. NEMA 23s
Thanks
John
With the motors de-energized I can move the gantry with some effort and the Y axis moves OK as well.
Do I need bigger motors? The current ones are 3.1nM 4.2A. NEMA 23s
Thanks
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6430
03 Jun 2021 12:39 #211090
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Picture of drives DIP switches and settings ?
Motors should do just fine.
Motors should do just fine.
The following user(s) said Thank You: jnwinkie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- samforsey12345
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 29
- Thank you received: 12
03 Jun 2021 13:48 #211091
by samforsey12345
Replied by samforsey12345 on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
You are getting a very consistent error, to me this does not indicate step losses..
I use similar motors at ~2:1 and don't have any issues similar to what you are experiencing, although I gave up trying to get cheap chinese drivers to work
All the best
Sam
I use similar motors at ~2:1 and don't have any issues similar to what you are experiencing, although I gave up trying to get cheap chinese drivers to work
All the best
Sam
The following user(s) said Thank You: jnwinkie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Jun 2021 22:27 #211101
by jnwinkie
Replied by jnwinkie on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Will do today.
Thanks
John
Thanks
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Jun 2021 22:28 #211102
by jnwinkie
Replied by jnwinkie on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Thanks Sam;
Could you tell me which drivers you use? Maybe worth checking into. Will post some pics later today my time as per Tommy's request.
Cheers
John
Could you tell me which drivers you use? Maybe worth checking into. Will post some pics later today my time as per Tommy's request.
Cheers
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6430
03 Jun 2021 22:59 #211107
by tommylight
Yes and some pictures of the cuts, round and square shapes.
Replied by tommylight on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Who, me?Will post some pics later today my time as per Tommy's request.
Yes and some pictures of the cuts, round and square shapes.
The following user(s) said Thank You: jnwinkie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 Jun 2021 02:48 #211122
by jnwinkie
Replied by jnwinkie on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Hi Tommy and Sam;
I am using DM542T stepper controllers. They are set to 4.2A for X and Y and set to 400 steps per rev. I tried higher micro stepping (I think there was some pics earlier) and this made no appreciable difference.
Thanks for your help.
John
I am using DM542T stepper controllers. They are set to 4.2A for X and Y and set to 400 steps per rev. I tried higher micro stepping (I think there was some pics earlier) and this made no appreciable difference.
Thanks for your help.
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BeagleBrainz
- Offline
- User is blocked
Less
More
- Posts: 1437
- Thank you received: 570
04 Jun 2021 02:55 #211123
by BeagleBrainz
Replied by BeagleBrainz on topic Apparent Step Errors MKII
Maybe unrelated, but just for good wiring practice, I'd try to have some separation between the signals to the stepper drivers (and any other logic signals) and the output from the stepper drivers to the stepper motors.
The following user(s) said Thank You: jnwinkie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.139 seconds